You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: _posts/2024-08-28-cheri-myths-safe-languages.markdown
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ If you can write *new* code in a safe language, especially a safe language that
78
78
79
79
Will a team that rewrites a legacy codebase or one that incrementally improves one have fewer bugs in their codebase?
80
80
If you rewrite existing code in a safe language then you can guarantee, by construction, that the code does not have bugs in the category that the language enforces.
81
-
The value of this can't be understated.
81
+
The value of this can't be overstated.
82
82
Knowing that code that compiles is free from a particular class of error has a huge value.
83
83
84
84
In spite of this improvement, there remains a big difference between 'memory safe' and 'correct'.
0 commit comments