Add novelty

Author: vtraag

_quarto.yml

@@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ website:
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/collaboration_intensity.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/diversity.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/extra-academic_collaboration.qmd
-            - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity.qmd
-            - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/novelty.qmd
+            - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity_novelty.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/use_of_code_in_research.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/use_of_data_in_research.qmd
 

indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity.qmd

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+author:
+    - name: L. Waltman
+      orcid: 0000-0001-8249-1752
+      affiliations:
+      - ref: cwts
+
+affiliations:
+- id: cwts
+  name: Leiden University
+  department: Centre for Science and Technology Studies
+  city: Leiden
+  country: the Netherlands
+---
+
+# Interdisciplinary and novelty {#interdisciplinarity-novelty .unnumbered}
+
+<div>
+
+## History
+
+| Version | Revision date | Revision    | Author     |
+|---------|---------------|-------------|------------|
+| 1.1     | 2023-12-17    | Add novelty | L. Waltman |
+| 1.0     | 2023-12-17    | First draft | L. Waltman |
+
+</div>
+
+## Description
+
+There is an extensive scientometric literature on indicators of interdisciplinarity, novelty, and other related concepts. However, the level of agreement among the various indicators introduced in the literature turns out to be low [@wang2020]. This appears to be the result of both different understandings of the concepts such as interdisciplinarity and novelty and different approaches to operationalize these concepts [@fontana_new_2020]. Given the lack of agreement on how to understand and operationalize the concepts of interdisciplinarity and novelty, we advise against the use of scientometric indicators of interdisciplinarity and novelty, and we consequently do not describe any such indicators. For further discussion, including alternative approaches to 'measure' interdisciplinarity, we refer to [@ràfols2020].

indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity_novelty.qmd

@@ -694,6 +694,19 @@ @article{fell2019
   note    = {Publisher: MDPI}
 }
 
+@article{fontana_new_2020,
+  title   = {New and atypical combinations: {An} assessment of novelty and interdisciplinarity},
+  volume  = {49},
+  issn    = {0048-7333},
+  doi     = {10.1016/j.respol.2020.104063},
+  number  = {7},
+  journal = {Res. Policy},
+  author  = {Fontana, Magda and Iori, Martina and Montobbio, Fabio and Sinatra, Roberta},
+  month   = sep,
+  year    = {2020},
+  pages   = {104063}
+}
+
 @article{forsell2019,
   title   = {Predicting replication outcomes in the Many Labs 2 study},
   author  = {Forsell, Eskil and Viganola, Domenico and Pfeiffer, Thomas and Almenberg, Johan and Wilson, Brad and Chen, Yiling and Nosek, Brian A. and Johannesson, Magnus and Dreber, Anna},
@@ -1043,6 +1056,7 @@ @article{istrate
   doi    = {10.48550/arXiv.2209.00693}
 }
 
+
 @inproceedings{jackson2016,
   title     = {CSCW '16: Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing},
   author    = {Jackson, Corey and {Østerlund}, Carsten and Maidel, Veronica and Crowston, Kevin and Mugar, Gabriel},
@@ -1057,7 +1071,6 @@ @inproceedings{jackson2016
   langid    = {en}
 }
 
-
 @inproceedings{jacob2019,
   title  = {FAIR principles, an new opportunity to improve the data lifecycle},
   author = {Jacob, Daniel},
@@ -1098,6 +1111,7 @@ @article{johnston2017
   note    = {Publisher: The University of Chicago Press}
 }
 
+
 @book{jung2023,
   title  = {scrutiny: Error Detection in Science},
   author = {Jung, Lukas and Allard, {Aurélien}},
@@ -1107,7 +1121,6 @@ @book{jung2023
   url    = {https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/scrutiny/index.html}
 }
 
-
 @article{keller2014,
   title   = {Re-use of public sector information in cultural heritage institutions},
   author  = {Keller, Paul and Margoni, Thomas and Rybicka, Katarzyna and Tarkowski, Alek},
@@ -1995,6 +2008,7 @@ @inbook{roberts2013a
   url       = {https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203824696-29&type=chapterpdf}
 }
 
+
 @article{robinson-garcia2017,
   title   = {DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations},
   author  = {Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas and Mongeon, Philippe and Jeng, Wei and Costas, Rodrigo},
@@ -2009,7 +2023,6 @@ @article{robinson-garcia2017
   url     = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751157717300834}
 }
 
-
 @article{robinson-garcia2020,
   title   = {Open Access uptake by universities worldwide},
   author  = {Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas and Costas, Rodrigo and van Leeuwen, Thed N.},
@@ -2453,6 +2466,7 @@ @book{wood2021
   note   = {original-date: 2018-01-29T16:15:29Z}
 }
 
+
 @article{woods2022,
   title   = {Incentivising research data sharing: a scoping review},
   author  = {Woods, Helen Buckley and Pinfield, Stephen},
@@ -2466,7 +2480,6 @@ @article{woods2022
   url     = {https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/6-355/v2}
 }
 
-
 @article{wuchty2007,
   title   = {The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge},
   author  = {Wuchty, Stefan and Jones, Benjamin F. and Uzzi, Brian},
@@ -2482,6 +2495,7 @@ @article{wuchty2007
   langid  = {en}
 }
 
+
 @article{yarkoni2019,
   title  = {The Generalizability Crisis},
   author = {Yarkoni, Tal},
@@ -2492,7 +2506,6 @@ @article{yarkoni2019
   url    = {https://psyarxiv.com/jqw35/}
 }
 
-
 @article{zahedi2017,
   title   = {Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications},
   author  = {Zahedi, Zohreh and Costas, Rodrigo and Wouters, Paul},