Skip to content

Conversation

@priyansh4320
Copy link
Collaborator

@priyansh4320 priyansh4320 commented Sep 5, 2025

Why are these changes needed?

Organize bloated conversable_agent.py and make it modular.

conversable_agent/
├── init.py
├── conversable_agent.py # Main class combining all mixins
├── base.py # Base class with initialization
├── messaging.py # Message handling (send, receive, append)
├── reply_handlers.py # Reply generation and processing
├── function_execution.py # Function/tool execution logic
├── code_execution.py # Code execution functionality
├── chat_management.py # Chat initiation and management
├── hooks_and_registry.py # Hooks, registration, capabilities
├── llm_integration.py # LLM configuration and OAI replies
├── conversable_utils.py # Utility functions and helpers
└── types.py # Type definitions and dataclasses

Benefits of This Refactoring

  1. Maintainability: Each file is focused on specific functionality
  2. Readability: organize code of ~5000 lines
  3. Testing: Easier to test individual components
  4. Debugging: Issues are easier to locate and fix
  5. Documentation: Each module can have focused documentation
  6. Reusability: Mixins can potentially be reused in other contexts

Related issue number

Checks

@joggrbot
Copy link

joggrbot bot commented Sep 5, 2025

📝 Documentation Analysis

All docs are up to date! 🎉


✅ Latest commit analyzed: fd12c17 | Powered by Joggr

@randombet
Copy link
Collaborator

Two general comments @priyansh4320

  1. have a clear goal (better to be aligned with future feature development), that make the refactoring more useful.
  2. Have a list of testing/verification we need to go through.

@priyansh4320 priyansh4320 marked this pull request as draft September 5, 2025 19:53
@Lancetnik
Copy link
Member

Lancetnik commented Sep 6, 2025

@priyansh4320 I have almost finished typing ConversibleAgent — I have resolved around 400 mypy errors and typed everything. I propose to merge these refactorings into a single pull request. Can I commit to this branch, not just to separate the code, but also to improve the typing?

So, if you have no additional plans on this PR, just leave it to me

@priyansh4320 priyansh4320 self-assigned this Sep 7, 2025
@priyansh4320
Copy link
Collaborator Author

priyansh4320 commented Sep 7, 2025

@qingyun-wu @randombet @sonichi @Lancetnik @VasiliyRad ,
the current FS changes looks like simple Seperation.
but with this particular change here's what I am achieveing for ag2,

Screenshot 2025-09-08 at 2 37 41 AM
  • its up to you @Lancetnik , how you want the AgentBus to operate.
  • @randombet , now if you change the name of CoversableAgent() , you might endup with a SystemAgent/AgentIC .
  • i hope this answers 1st question.
  • for 2nd Question, i will add some robust tests.

@priyansh4320 priyansh4320 marked this pull request as ready for review October 27, 2025 22:06
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Code Review: Refactor ConversableAgent

Thank you for this ambitious refactoring effort! Splitting a 4294-line monolithic file into modular components is excellent. However, there are several critical issues that must be fixed before merge.

Critical Issues

1. Missing init.py File - The conversable_agent/ directory needs an init.py to be a proper Python package and maintain backward compatibility.

2. Typo: massaging.py → messaging.py - File should be messaging.py not massaging.py. Update the import in conversable_agent.py:27.

3. Duplicate Method Definitions - These methods are defined in BOTH base.py AND conversable_utils.py:

  • _normalize_name (base.py:368, conversable_utils.py:28)
  • _assert_valid_name (base.py:354, conversable_utils.py:36)
  • _is_silent (base.py:256, conversable_utils.py:48)
  • _should_terminate_chat (chat_management.py:50, conversable_utils.py:51)

4. Triple register_function Definition - Appears in conversable_agent.py:217, types.py:52, and function_execution.py. Keep only ONE.

5. Duplicate Copyright Header - hooks_and_registry.py has copyright header twice (lines 0-5).

Major Issues

6. No Tests - Need import tests to verify backward compatibility and module structure.

7. Missing Documentation - Document backward compatibility approach and any breaking changes.

Design Suggestions

8. MRO Consideration - With duplicate methods, inheritance order matters. Document the intended resolution order.

9. Better Docstrings - Each mixin should document what methods it adds and dependencies.

Must Fix Before Merge:

  • Add init.py
  • Rename massaging.py → messaging.py
  • Remove duplicate methods
  • Consolidate register_function
  • Fix duplicate copyright
  • Add basic tests

This will be a great improvement once these issues are resolved! The modular structure (11 files vs 1 monolith) will significantly improve maintainability.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
see 21 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ag2ai ag2ai deleted a comment from claude bot Oct 27, 2025
@priyansh4320 priyansh4320 marked this pull request as draft October 27, 2025 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants