Replies: 1 comment
-
bcprov-ext (when it exists/existed) was a replacement for bcprov that included extra algorithms that almost everyone wouldn't need (for one reason or another). You shouldn't have been including both bcprov and bcprov-ext in earlier versions, and I think you will be fine just deleting your bcprov-ext dependency now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
We're currently including these in our product:
To address CVE-2025-8916 we're moving to version 1.82. The latest version of bcprov-ext-jdk18on is 1.78.1. I can't find any statements about this and, frankly, I'm the furthest thing from an expert about BC. I'm just trying to help with some planning.
So, my possibly silly question is, if we're moving to 1.82, do we include bcprov-ext-jdk18on 1.78.1? Or do we just stop shipping bcprov-ext-jdk18on altogether?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions