You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: content/blog/2025-03-10-fixing-memory-leak/index.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ rise and fall of CPU and memory usage. The memory leak is really fixed. 😀
59
59
Fixing the memory leak in `metafacture` resolved some issues we've experienced:
60
60
-`lobid-resources`: daily updates sometimes aborted - although this was not such a big thing because our monitor scripts could "heal" the update process automatically (by restarting the app). However, the updates now don't take e.g. 4h (counting from triggering the update until the successful ETL) but 0.45m, which is way faster.
61
61
-`Metafacture Playground`: we had some [performance issues](https://github.com/metafacture/metafacture-playground/issues/194) which are now solved.
62
-
-`RPB`: a situation arised where we could only ever add more memory to our VMs to counteract a crash of cataloguing - always fearing that not too much documents were ETLed before the daily restart of the cataloguing app.
62
+
-`RPB`: a situation arose where we could only ever add more memory to our VMs to counteract a crash of cataloguing - always fearing that not too much documents were ETLed before the daily restart of the cataloguing app.
63
63
64
64
# How to and credits
65
65
It is _one_ thing to discover a memory leak, but another thing to
0 commit comments