|  | 
|  | 1 | +--- | 
|  | 2 | +pip: 44 | 
|  | 3 | +title: Decentralized AI Chatbot and DAO Governance for Pactus | 
|  | 4 | +description: > | 
|  | 5 | +  Integrates a decentralized AI chatbot for wallet operations and DAO governance, | 
|  | 6 | +  halves validator rewards to incentivize compute contributors, and enables WASM smart contract deployment. | 
|  | 7 | +author: Curtis Caudill (@cjcaudill79) | 
|  | 8 | +status: Draft | 
|  | 9 | +category: Core | 
|  | 10 | +created: 2025-09-13 | 
|  | 11 | +--- | 
|  | 12 | + | 
|  | 13 | +## Abstract | 
|  | 14 | + | 
|  | 15 | +Pactus's focus on accessibility, security, and sustainability via SSPoS makes it ripe for innovation. | 
|  | 16 | +This proposal introduces a decentralized AI chatbot to simplify wallet operations and DAO governance, | 
|  | 17 | +empowering users with natural language commands. By halving validator rewards to fund compute contributors, | 
|  | 18 | +it fosters a sustainable ecosystem. A long-term goal allows developers to | 
|  | 19 | +deploy WASM-based smart contracts via the chatbot, boosting dApp growth and | 
|  | 20 | +positioning Pactus as a leader in AI-blockchain integration. | 
|  | 21 | + | 
|  | 22 | +## Motivation | 
|  | 23 | + | 
|  | 24 | +- Community Empowerment: A DAO aligns with Pactus's decentralized ethos, giving users a voice. | 
|  | 25 | +- AI Leadership: Positions Pactus as a pioneer, attracting tech-savvy participants. | 
|  | 26 | +- Adoption Growth: Simplifies interactions, potentially increasing users 2-5x. | 
|  | 27 | +- Sustainability: Reward adjustments support long-term economic stability. | 
|  | 28 | + | 
|  | 29 | +## Specification | 
|  | 30 | + | 
|  | 31 | +- **Architecture**: Features a frontend AI chatbot (web/mobile with NLP, sharded LLMs like Llama), | 
|  | 32 | +  a decentralized compute layer (node runners contribute GPU/CPU, tracked on-chain), | 
|  | 33 | +  and blockchain integration (Pactus APIs, PVM). | 
|  | 34 | +- **Reward Mechanism Modification**: Reduces validator rewards from 0.7 PAC/block (post-PIP-43) to 0.35 PAC/block, | 
|  | 35 | +  allocating 0.35 PAC/block to compute contributors, with the Foundation's 0.3 PAC/block unchanged. | 
|  | 36 | +  Rewards are distributed pro-rata based on FLOPs/hashrate, requiring minimal staking to prevent sybils, | 
|  | 37 | +  implemented via PIP and tested on testnet. | 
|  | 38 | +- **Wallet Functionality**: AI enables address creation, send/receive PAC, staking, | 
|  | 39 | +  and balance queries using the consumptional fee model. | 
|  | 40 | +- **DAO Governance**: Requires 100 PAC to propose, 10 PAC to vote, with a 1% voting cap (~420,000 PAC) per voter and | 
|  | 41 | +  10% staked supply quorum. The Pactus team holds veto power due to execution responsibility, | 
|  | 42 | +  ensuring security. DAO proposals can be made and displayed for voting through the chatbot. | 
|  | 43 | +- **User Rewards**: Offers 0.001-0.01 PAC per interaction from fees/community pool, capped daily. | 
|  | 44 | + | 
|  | 45 | +## Backwards Compatibility | 
|  | 46 | + | 
|  | 47 | +Unsure | 
|  | 48 | + | 
|  | 49 | +## Test Cases | 
|  | 50 | + | 
|  | 51 | +- Test reward halving on testnet to ensure fair distribution. | 
|  | 52 | +- Simulate AI-driven wallet operations and DAO voting. | 
|  | 53 | + | 
|  | 54 | +## Reference Implementation | 
|  | 55 | + | 
|  | 56 | +- **AI Chatbot Development**: Uses PyTorch/TensorFlow for federated learning, fine-tuning Llama on wallet ops, | 
|  | 57 | +  governance, and WASM syntax. Nodes run WASM-based inference, tracked via | 
|  | 58 | +  on-chain proofs (e.g., Merkle proofs of FLOPs). Integrates Pactus JS SDK and gRPC for tx submission. | 
|  | 59 | + | 
|  | 60 | +## Security Considerations | 
|  | 61 | + | 
|  | 62 | +- Risks include reward resistance and low adoption. | 
|  | 63 | +- Mitigations: Gradual phasing and marketing via Pactus channels to encourage participation. | 
|  | 64 | + | 
|  | 65 | +Added for additional context - Can delete if needed (Some redundancy) | 
|  | 66 | + | 
|  | 67 | +1 Executive Summary | 
|  | 68 | +As you know, Pactus’s focus on accessibility, security, and sustainability via SSPoS positions | 
|  | 69 | +it for innovative advancements. This proposal introduces a decentralized AI chatbot | 
|  | 70 | +and DAO governance to enhance user accessibility, streamline wallet operations, and empower | 
|  | 71 | +community-driven decision-making. By halving validator rewards to incentivize compute contributors, | 
|  | 72 | +we foster a sustainable ecosystem aligned with Pactus’s vision. The long-term goal | 
|  | 73 | +enables developers to deploy WASM-based smart contracts via the chatbot, accelerating dApp | 
|  | 74 | +growth. This PIP aims to drive adoption, boost PAC utility, and establish Pactus as a leader in | 
|  | 75 | +AI-blockchain integration. | 
|  | 76 | + | 
|  | 77 | +2 Proposed Integration: Decentralized AI Chatbot and DAO | 
|  | 78 | +2.1 High-Level Concept | 
|  | 79 | +The initiative introduces a decentralized AI chatbot as a user-friendly interface for wallet operations | 
|  | 80 | +and DAO governance via natural language (e.g., “Send 5 PAC” or “Vote on proposal | 
|  | 81 | +X”). Compute is provided by node runners, incentivized through restructured rewards. The | 
|  | 82 | +DAO enables PAC holders to propose and vote on upgrades, with team veto and voting caps for | 
|  | 83 | +fairness. | 
|  | 84 | + | 
|  | 85 | +2.1.1 Why Beneficial | 
|  | 86 | +• Community Empowerment: DAO aligns with Pactus’s decentralized ethos. | 
|  | 87 | +• AI Leadership: Positions Pactus as a pioneer, attracting tech-savvy users. | 
|  | 88 | +• Adoption Growth: Simplifies interactions, potentially increasing users 2–5x. | 
|  | 89 | +• Sustainability: Reward changes support long-term economic stability. | 
|  | 90 | + | 
|  | 91 | +2.2 Architecture | 
|  | 92 | +• Frontend AI Chatbot: Web/mobile app with NLP, built on sharded LLMs (e.g., Llama). | 
|  | 93 | +• Decentralized Compute Layer: Node runners contribute GPU/CPU; contributions tracked | 
|  | 94 | +on-chain. | 
|  | 95 | +• Blockchain Integration: Uses Pactus APIs and PVM for rewards and governance. | 
|  | 96 | +• Components: | 
|  | 97 | +– Wallet Module: Address generation, transactions, staking. | 
|  | 98 | +– Governance Module: Proposal creation, voting interface. | 
|  | 99 | + | 
|  | 100 | +2.2.1 Why Advantageous | 
|  | 101 | +• Scalability: Distributed compute scales with network growth. | 
|  | 102 | +• Security: On-chain proofs and local key management reduce risks. | 
|  | 103 | +• Synergy: Integrates with decentralized storage and PVM. | 
|  | 104 | + | 
|  | 105 | +Pactus AI & DAO Proposal | 
|  | 106 | +2.3 Reward Mechanism Modification | 
|  | 107 | +Adjust validator rewards (0.7 PAC/block post-PIP-43) to 0.35 PAC/block for validators and | 
|  | 108 | +0.35 PAC/block for compute contributors, maintaining the Foundation’s 0.3 PAC/block. | 
|  | 109 | +• Distribution: Compute rewards allocated pro-rata based on FLOPs/hashrate, with minimal | 
|  | 110 | +staking to prevent sybils. | 
|  | 111 | +• Implementation: Propose via PIP; test on testnet. | 
|  | 112 | + | 
|  | 113 | +2.3.1 Why This is Good | 
|  | 114 | +• Inclusivity: Attracts AI contributors, expanding participation. | 
|  | 115 | +• Economic Balance: Extends emissions, supporting PIP-43 goals. | 
|  | 116 | +• Token Utility: Ties PAC value to AI usage, boosting demand. | 
|  | 117 | + | 
|  | 118 | +2.4 Wallet Functionality | 
|  | 119 | +AI enables wallet operations: address creation, send/receive PAC, staking, and balance queries, | 
|  | 120 | +leveraging the consumptional fee model. | 
|  | 121 | + | 
|  | 122 | +2.4.1 Benefits | 
|  | 123 | +• User-Friendly: Reduces onboarding friction, boosting retention. | 
|  | 124 | +• Ecosystem Growth: Complements GUI and web wallet enhancements. | 
|  | 125 | + | 
|  | 126 | +2.5 DAO Governance | 
|  | 127 | +• Mechanics: Stake 100 PAC to propose, 10 PAC to vote; voting capped at 1% of total | 
|  | 128 | +supply ( 420,000 PAC) per voter; 10% staked supply quorum. Although the community | 
|  | 129 | +introduces proposals, the Pactus team retains veto power, as they would be responsible | 
|  | 130 | +for carrying them out, ensuring security and protocol integrity. | 
|  | 131 | +• AI Role: Guides staking/voting processes. | 
|  | 132 | +• Topics: Upgrades, reward changes, AI updates. | 
|  | 133 | + | 
|  | 134 | +2.5.1 Why Beneficial | 
|  | 135 | +• Fairness: Voting caps prevent whale dominance. | 
|  | 136 | +• Alignment: Supports on-chain governance plans. | 
|  | 137 | +• Engagement: AI simplifies participation, increasing turnout. | 
|  | 138 | + | 
|  | 139 | +2.6 User Rewards | 
|  | 140 | +Micro-rewards (0.001–0.01 PAC per interaction) from fees/community pool, capped daily. | 
|  | 141 | + | 
|  | 142 | +Pactus AI & DAO Proposal | 
|  | 143 | +2.6.1 Advantages | 
|  | 144 | +• Adoption Incentive: Increases transaction volume. | 
|  | 145 | +• Token Stability: Promotes holding/staking, supporting PAC value. | 
|  | 146 | +3 Long-Term Goal: Smart Contract Deployment via AI Chatbot | 
|  | 147 | + | 
|  | 148 | +3.1 High-Level Overview | 
|  | 149 | +Extend the AI chatbot to allow developers to deploy WASM-based smart contracts via natural | 
|  | 150 | +language, integrating with PVM to accelerate dApp development. | 
|  | 151 | + | 
|  | 152 | +3.1.1 Why Beneficial | 
|  | 153 | +• Reduces development barriers. | 
|  | 154 | +• Drives ecosystem growth via dApps. | 
|  | 155 | +• Merges AI usability with blockchain programmability. | 
|  | 156 | + | 
|  | 157 | +3.2 Technical Explanation | 
|  | 158 | + | 
|  | 159 | +PVM supports WASM-based smart contracts. | 
|  | 160 | + | 
|  | 161 | +1. Prerequisites: | 
|  | 162 | + | 
|  | 163 | +• PVM operational. | 
|  | 164 | +• Pactus SDK (JS/Python) for tx building. | 
|  | 165 | +• AI fine-tuned for code parsing (e.g., via CodeBERT). | 
|  | 166 | + | 
|  | 167 | +2. User Input Processing: | 
|  | 168 | + | 
|  | 169 | +• Developer inputs: “Deploy contract: wasm code” or similar. | 
|  | 170 | +• AI parses code, language, and parameters using NLP. | 
|  | 171 | + | 
|  | 172 | +3. Code Validation: | 
|  | 173 | + | 
|  | 174 | +• Syntax check with linters (e.g., wasm-lint for WASM). | 
|  | 175 | +• Static analysis for vulnerabilities (e.g., custom WASM tools). | 
|  | 176 | +• Simulate execution in sandbox (wasmtime for WASM). | 
|  | 177 | + | 
|  | 178 | +4. Compilation: | 
|  | 179 | + | 
|  | 180 | +• Compile to PVM bytecode (e.g., wasm-pack or Pactus-specific compiler). | 
|  | 181 | +• AI handles errors, suggests fixes (e.g., missing imports). | 
|  | 182 | + | 
|  | 183 | +5. Transaction Construction: | 
|  | 184 | + | 
|  | 185 | +• Pactus AI & DAO Proposal | 
|  | 186 | +• Build deployment tx via Pactus gRPC/REST API. | 
|  | 187 | +• Include bytecode, ABI, constructor args; calculate fees per PIP-31. | 
|  | 188 | + | 
|  | 189 | +6. Signing and Broadcast: | 
|  | 190 | + | 
|  | 191 | +• User approves/signs via chatbot (local key management). | 
|  | 192 | +• Broadcast tx to Pactus nodes. | 
|  | 193 | + | 
|  | 194 | +7. Post-Deployment: | 
|  | 195 | + | 
|  | 196 | +• Poll tx status via API; return contract address, logs. | 
|  | 197 | +• AI enables interaction (e.g., “Call function X with args Y”). | 
|  | 198 | + | 
|  | 199 | +8. Decentralized Aspects: | 
|  | 200 | + | 
|  | 201 | +• Offload compilation/validation to compute contributors (e.g., via distributed WebAssembly runtimes). | 
|  | 202 | +• DAO governs supported languages and tools. | 
|  | 203 | + | 
|  | 204 | +9. Security: | 
|  | 205 | + | 
|  | 206 | +• Rate limits and stake requirements (e.g., 100 PAC) for deployments. | 
|  | 207 | +• AI flags risky code (e.g., reentrancy risks) for manual review or veto. | 
|  | 208 | +4 Technical Implementation Details | 
|  | 209 | +• AI Chatbot Development: | 
|  | 210 | + | 
|  | 211 | +– Framework: Use PyTorch/TensorFlow for federated learning, sharding LLM across | 
|  | 212 | +nodes. | 
|  | 213 | +– Training: Fine-tune Llama or similar on blockchain-specific tasks (wallet ops, governance, | 
|  | 214 | +WASM syntax). | 
|  | 215 | +– Compute Contribution: Nodes run lightweight WASM-based inference tasks; | 
|  | 216 | +contributions tracked via on-chain proofs (e.g., Merkle proofs of FLOPs). | 
|  | 217 | +– APIs: Integrate Pactus JS SDK for wallet/governance; gRPC for tx submission. | 
|  | 218 | + | 
|  | 219 | +## Conclusion | 
|  | 220 | + | 
|  | 221 | +This PIP leverages Pactus’s strengths to integrate a decentralized AI chatbot and DAO, enhancing | 
|  | 222 | +accessibility and governance. By building on PIP-43 and planned on-chain governance, it | 
|  | 223 | +ensures sustainability and positions Pactus as an AI-blockchain leader. We urge the team to | 
|  | 224 | +review and advance this proposal for community discussion. | 
0 commit comments