- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 65
 
Add section on challenges (non-responding reviewers) #955
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Also move text on non-responding authors to this section
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!!
Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Maëlle Salmon <[email protected]>
        
          
                softwarereview_editor.pt.Rmd
              
                Outdated
          
        
      | 
               | 
          ||
| #### Desafios durante a revisão {#challenges-during-review} | ||
| 
               | 
          ||
| - **Se o autor parar de responder** consulte [as políticas](#policies) e/ou envie um ping para os outros editores no canal do Slack para discussão. É importante ressaltar que, se um revisor foi atribuído a um problema fechado, entre em contato com ele ao fechar o problema para explicar a decisão e agradecê-lo mais uma vez pelo trabalho. Informe os outros editores no canal Slack para que eles sejam considerados para um pacote no futuro com grandes chances de uma revisão de software tranquila (por exemplo, um autor de pacote que já tenha enviado pacotes para nós). | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi! Just to clarify If I understood correcly:
"Let the other editors know in the Slack channel to consider them for a package in the future with high chances of smooth software review (e.g. a package author who has already submitted packages to us)."
I think I'm not sure if I understood the context of the whole sentence. In this case, "consider them" is related to the reviewer, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that's right.
| 
           I will review it next week; it needs more work than usual because of the gender mark. Plus, it replaces text that we already translated and reviewed (like the first paragraph), so I need to be careful to put that back and only translate the new lines.  | 
    
| 
           I still have to review the gender marks, but I will try to do it this week. Next week I'll be at Posit Conf 🎉 From what I have seen, @noamross and I will be at the same session. Looking forward to meeting you there!  | 
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changing wording to respect original translation and remove gender mark from new content.
Co-authored-by: Yanina Bellini Saibene <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Beatriz Milz <[email protected]>
| 
           Thanks so much @beatrizmilz @yabellini (and thanks again @noamross!)  | 
    
Also move text on non-responding authors to this section.
Resolves #846