Reintroduce Web Annoyances Ultralist #1126
Open
+5
−7
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![windsurf-bot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1066231?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
It seems that the filters list does not have enough GitHub stars to add any filters list. |
|
We'll keep an eye on it. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, after the original Web Annoyances Ultralist became unmaintained, it got removed in #871.
Two years and 459 commits later, we have a well-established fork with many new commits, fixes, etc, a small but established community and a quick maintainer.
It would be nice to add us back again, so that more people can benefit from the (now bugfixed and updated) list, as well as to increase attention to the fork, so that more people feel like contributing, who might have in the past.
This PR is adding the updated fork again to the list of maintained third party sources. I have just tried to update the URLs and revert the changes done in #871. If I did anything wrong, I apologise.
I thought just asking with a quick PR is the easiest way; I hope this is not too blunt.