Skip to content

Conversation

@gdeluna-branch
Copy link
Contributor

Reference

SDK-XXX -- <TITLE>.

Description

Testing Instructions

Risk Assessment [HIGH || MEDIUM || LOW]

  • I, the PR creator, have tested — integration, unit, or otherwise — this code.

Reviewer Checklist (To be checked off by the reviewer only)

  • JIRA Ticket is referenced in PR title.
  • Correctness & Style
    • Conforms to AOSP Style Guides
    • Mission critical pieces are documented in code and out of code as needed.
  • Unit Tests reviewed and test issue sufficiently.
  • Functionality was reviewed in QA independently by another engineer on the team.

cc @BranchMetrics/saas-sdk-devs for visibility.

@matter-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

Code Quality versioning

Reference

SDK-XXX -- Release 6.0.0-alpha.1.

Description

Summary By MatterAI MatterAI logo

🔄 What Changed

This pull request updates the project's version from 5.20.3 to 6.0.0-alpha.1 and the corresponding VERSION_CODE from 052403 to 060000 in gradle.properties.

🔍 Impact of the Change

This change signifies a major version increment, moving from a stable release to an alpha release of version 6.0.0. It directly impacts the artifact version published and the Android application's internal version code, indicating a new development cycle or significant breaking changes from the previous major version. It aligns with standard versioning conventions for software releases.

📁 Total Files Changed

  • gradle.properties: Updated VERSION_NAME and VERSION_CODE for the new release.

🧪 Test Added

N/A - This change is a configuration update and does not involve adding new code that requires unit or integration tests.

🔒Security Vulnerabilities

N/A - This change does not introduce or mitigate any security vulnerabilities as it only updates versioning properties.

Testing Instructions

N/A - This is a version bump in a configuration file. The primary 'testing' would involve a successful Gradle build and verification of the generated artifact's version.

Risk Assessment [LOW]

  • I, the PR creator, have tested — integration, unit, or otherwise — this code.

Reviewer Checklist (To be checked off by the reviewer only)

  • JIRA Ticket is referenced in PR title.
  • Correctness & Style
    • Conforms to AOSP Style Guides
    • Mission critical pieces are documented in code and out of code as needed.
  • Unit Tests reviewed and test issue sufficiently.
  • Functionality was reviewed in QA independently by another engineer on the team.

cc @BranchMetrics/saas-sdk-devs for visibility.

Tanka Poem ♫

New version ascends,
Alpha dawn, a fresh start blooms.
Code evolves, expands,
Future features softly gleam,
Builds now sing a different tune. 🚀

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Developer
    participant GradleProperties as gradle.properties
    participant GradleBuildSystem as Gradle Build System
    participant PublishedArtifact as Published Artifact

    Developer->>GradleProperties: Update VERSION_NAME and VERSION_CODE
    Note over Developer,GradleProperties: Set to 6.0.0-alpha.1 and 060000
    GradleBuildSystem->>GradleProperties: Read version properties
    GradleBuildSystem->>GradleBuildSystem: Configure build with new versions
    GradleBuildSystem-->>PublishedArtifact: Generate/Publish artifact (v6.0.0-alpha.1)
Loading

@matter-code-review
Copy link
Contributor

Important

PR Review Skipped

PR review skipped as per the configuration setting. Run a manually review by commenting /matter review

💡Tips to use MatterAI

Command List

  • /matter summary: Generate AI Summary for the PR
  • /matter review: Generate AI Reviews for the latest commit in the PR
  • /matter review-full: Generate AI Reviews for the complete PR
  • /matter release-notes: Generate AI release-notes for the PR
  • /matter : Chat with your PR with MatterAI Agent
  • /matter remember : Generate AI memories for the PR
  • /matter explain: Get an explanation of the PR
  • /matter help: Show the list of available commands and documentation
  • Need help? Join our Discord server: https://discord.gg/fJU5DvanU3

Copy link

@bboothe-branch bboothe-branch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we mention the showShareSheet() function's update? Or is that not relevant here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants