Skip to content

Conversation

@OlivierBBB
Copy link
Collaborator

this relationship fails starting with EIP-7623 (Prague)

this relationship fails starting with EIP-7623 (Prague)
@OlivierBBB OlivierBBB self-assigned this Sep 23, 2025
\item[\underline{Justifying $\txEffectiveRefund$:}]
if the network runs on the \textsc{Cancun}-\evm{},
we may impose the followign sanity check constraint:
\[ \txEffectiveRefund _{i + \roffTxSkipUserTransaction} = \txLeftoverGas _{i + \roffTxSkipUserTransaction} \quad (\sanityCheck) \]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prior to EIP-7623 we had the following relationship between

REFUND_EFFECTIVE = GAS_LEFTOVER

for TX_SKIP transactions. This relationship fails starting with EIP-7623 (Prague) since one now pays

max ( GAS_LIMIT - GAS_LEFTOVER , FLOOR_GAS_COST )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant