-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 1.4k
Remove wrong guideline #42090
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove wrong guideline #42090
Conversation
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates Successful checksInfo
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 34052fc Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +12.41 | [+11.12, +13.70] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ❌ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +12.41 | [+11.12, +13.70] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | +1.55 | [-1.25, +4.35] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | +1.00 | [+0.80, +1.21] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | +0.73 | [+0.56, +0.89] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.49 | [+0.33, +0.65] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.33 | [+0.29, +0.37] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.20 | [+0.16, +0.24] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.10 | [-0.50, +0.70] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.09 | [-0.52, +0.70] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.20, +0.27] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.58, +0.64] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +0.02 | [-0.11, +0.14] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.62, +0.59] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.11 | [-0.15, -0.06] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.14 | [-0.25, -0.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | -0.32 | [-0.38, -0.26] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.37 | [-0.49, -0.25] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | -0.41 | [-0.60, -0.22] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | -0.44 | [-0.48, -0.39] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -1.67 | [-1.75, -1.59] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | -1.73 | [-2.17, -1.29] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ❌ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 9/10 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | lost_bytes | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | lost_bytes | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
Remove a guideline that indicates to push commit with [skip ci]. This is a bad idea because the PR will end up in an unmergeable state. We need to the CI to run before merging
Motivation
Describe how you validated your changes
Additional Notes