Skip to content

Conversation

Gerrygames
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Owen1212055
Copy link
Member

Is it worth making this a generic record storage in case additional fields could be transferred in the future?
For now though it may just be something like:

record TransferSession(Collection<ResourcePackInfo> appliedPacks) {}

May just make it easier to add onto in the future.

@electronicboy
Copy link
Member

electronicboy commented Jan 17, 2025

The size of a cookie is fairly limited, if we want to store additional info it would make more sense to send additional cookies, IMHO; I guess you could make it more abstracted out, but, we'd still be sending separate cookies out, etc; so, I'm not 100% sure entirely what we'd get trying to combine stuff too much (other than a bunch more code to maintain)

@Gerrygames Gerrygames force-pushed the feat/applied-resource-packs-transfer branch from 5ca718b to 93dc20f Compare February 26, 2025 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants