Add novelty

_quarto.yml

@@ -75,8 +75,7 @@ website:
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/collaboration_intensity.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/diversity.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/extra-academic_collaboration.qmd
-            - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity.qmd
-            - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/novelty.qmd
+            - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity_novelty.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/quality.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/use_of_code_in_research.qmd
             - indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/use_of_data_in_research.qmd

indicator_templates/quarto/2_academic_impact/interdisciplinarity_novelty.qmd

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+author:
+    - name: L. Waltman
+      orcid: 0000-0001-8249-1752
+      affiliations:
+      - ref: cwts
+
+affiliations:
+- id: cwts
+  name: Leiden University
+  department: Centre for Science and Technology Studies
+  city: Leiden
+  country: the Netherlands
+---
+
+# Interdisciplinary and novelty {#interdisciplinarity-novelty .unnumbered}
+
+<div>
+
+## History
+
+| Version | Revision date | Revision    | Author     |
+|---------|---------------|-------------|------------|
+| 1.1     | 2023-12-17    | Add novelty | L. Waltman |
+| 1.0     | 2023-12-17    | First draft | L. Waltman |
+
+</div>
+
+## Description
+
+There is an extensive scientometric literature on indicators of interdisciplinarity, novelty, and other related concepts. However, the level of agreement among the various indicators introduced in the literature turns out to be low [@wang2020]. This appears to be the result of both different understandings of the concepts such as interdisciplinarity and novelty and different approaches to operationalize these concepts [@fontana_new_2020]. Given the lack of agreement on how to understand and operationalize the concepts of interdisciplinarity and novelty, we advise against the use of scientometric indicators of interdisciplinarity and novelty, and we consequently do not describe any such indicators. For further discussion, including alternative approaches to 'measure' interdisciplinarity, we refer to [@ràfols2020].

references.bib

@@ -765,6 +765,19 @@ @article{fell2019
   note    = {Publisher: MDPI}
 }
 
+@article{fontana_new_2020,
+  title   = {New and atypical combinations: {An} assessment of novelty and interdisciplinarity},
+  volume  = {49},
+  issn    = {0048-7333},
+  doi     = {10.1016/j.respol.2020.104063},
+  number  = {7},
+  journal = {Res. Policy},
+  author  = {Fontana, Magda and Iori, Martina and Montobbio, Fabio and Sinatra, Roberta},
+  month   = sep,
+  year    = {2020},
+  pages   = {104063}
+}
+
 @article{forsell2019,
   title   = {Predicting replication outcomes in the Many Labs 2 study},
   author  = {Forsell, Eskil and Viganola, Domenico and Pfeiffer, Thomas and Almenberg, Johan and Wilson, Brad and Chen, Yiling and Nosek, Brian A. and Johannesson, Magnus and Dreber, Anna},
@@ -1224,6 +1237,7 @@ @article{johnston2017
   note    = {Publisher: The University of Chicago Press}
 }
 
+
 @book{jung2023,
   title  = {scrutiny: Error Detection in Science},
   author = {Jung, Lukas and Allard, {Aurélien}},
@@ -2145,6 +2159,7 @@ @inbook{roberts2013a
   url       = {https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203824696-29&type=chapterpdf}
 }
 
+
 @article{robinson-garcia2017,
   title   = {DataCite as a novel bibliometric source: Coverage, strengths and limitations},
   author  = {Robinson-Garcia, Nicolas and Mongeon, Philippe and Jeng, Wei and Costas, Rodrigo},
@@ -2702,8 +2717,6 @@ @article{wuchty2007
 }
 
 
-
-
 @article{yarkoni2019,
   title  = {The Generalizability Crisis},
   author = {Yarkoni, Tal},