Add Internet Access Logs indicator #90
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Revised version to 1) Focus only on the access logs as an indicator, not necessarily the relationship with OS. 2) Removing the explanation of the relationship to the French PathOS case study.
Update OS_access_advantage.qmd
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This contains the quarto converted from a Word file. Please double check if the conversion was correct.
When reviewing the indicator, I have a few comments.
I would suggest to focus only on the access logs as an indicator, not necessarily the relationship with OS. As with all indicators, we rarely try to provide an effect of one OS aspect on impact, but instead, we simply provide a relevant indicator of impact. After all, although you focused on the effect of Open Access on usage in your case, other effects, such as of Citizen Science or Code Availability, could also be studies using access logs. So, you can remove most of the details around open access (for which we already provide information in the indicator on Open Access anyway).
For that reason, I suggest labelling the indicator something like "Internet Access Logs", or something similar. Let me know what you prefer.
In a similar vein, some of the text explaining the relationship to the French PathOS case study can be removed all together. The handbook is meant to be something that can be used generally, and does not necessarily need to provide the details of the French case study. Perhaps you can refer to the case study somehow instead, as an example of where this indicator has been applied?
There are some missing references:
Could you please provide the full references for them?