- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 659
Adding a process for briefing changes to the website team #13246
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub. 
 💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 files reviewed, 3 comments
        
          
                contents/handbook/engineering/posthog-com/developing-the-website.mdx
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
              
          
                contents/handbook/engineering/posthog-com/developing-the-website.mdx
              
                Outdated
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
        
      Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…te.mdx Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…te.mdx Co-authored-by: greptile-apps[bot] <165735046+greptile-apps[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…te.mdx Nice Co-authored-by: James Hawkins <[email protected]>
| As mentioned in Lisbon a couple times when discussing process, I don't think we're at the point where we should be adding more process like this where website is a dependency like the artwork process. We should be more collaborative in working together, to the point we don't even need a new process because we're already in communication/in sync earlier in the process. At some point maybe we'll need something like this, but I don't think this is the right approach for our team size and where we're at right now. | 
| Definitely heard on the process point, and have tried to keep this as light as possible there. Intent was just to create a way to enable that collaboration you describe. Only thing I feel strongly about is having a clear direction and avoiding things getting lost in Google Docs and Slack DMs, etc. To move this to a yes and mode, do you have a way you'd prefer this to work? | 
Changes
Content here may be useful for @cleo-pleurodon and @SaraMiteva too