Skip to content

Conversation

@torrinba
Copy link
Contributor

This uses the new averaging functions in the IMAS PR ProjectTorreyPines/IMAS.jl#280. The data is averaged over the same time window that is used in EFIT, which could be setup as input variables if there is interest in more easily varying it. These averages are currently just over independent windows, which differs from EFIT and alternative options may be added in the future.

This uses the new averaging functions in an IMAS repo PR. The data
is averaged over the same time window that is used in EFIT, which
could be made into input variables if there is interest in more
easily varying it. These averages are currently just over independent
windows, which differs from EFIT and different options may be added
in the future.
@torrinba torrinba self-assigned this Sep 11, 2025
@torrinba torrinba added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@bclyons12 bclyons12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ProjectTorreyPines/IMAS.jl#280 is merged, but please address these comments.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should change the default behavior to be averaging. That's a specific use case. Often you just want the current at a specific time.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here I'm more fine with averaging for the flux loop since that's actual data that could be noisy. I suppose we should make sure that this doesn't have any issue with smooth, synthetic data or any need for causal averaging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants