Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/meta/correlations.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -287,13 +287,13 @@ level: high
| search event_type_count >= 2
```

### `ordered_temporal`
### `temporal_ordered`

The ordered temporal correlation is similar to the former, but adds the order of the events as another condition. This correlation type should be used cautiously due to several factors:
The temporal ordered correlation is similar to the former, but adds the order of the events as another condition. This correlation type should be used cautiously due to several factors:

- Often, the appearance of certain events in a specific time frame is already sufficient for the detection. E.g. the famous example of multiple failed logons followed by a successful one delivers mostly the same results if the failed and successful logon just appear within the same time frame.
- Compared to the temporal correlation the queries required to check the order are usually more complex and less efficient.
- Some backends don’t implement support for ordered temporal correlation or it’s even not possible to implement this within a query language.
- Some backends don’t implement support for temporal ordered correlation or it’s even not possible to implement this within a query language.
- Especially when events appear very near to each other and events from different log sources are correlated, different time resolutions and clock skews can cause that the events appear in a different order as they occurred.

Altogether, this correlation type should only be used if really required.
Expand Down