Skip to content

Conversation

JonasBK
Copy link
Contributor

@JonasBK JonasBK commented Aug 6, 2025

Description

Collection of additional CA reg key value (RPC encryption enforcement)

Motivation and Context

This change is required for ADCS ESC11 coverage.

Corresponding BHCE PR: SpecterOps/BloodHound#1679

Resolves BED-6182

How Has This Been Tested?

Locally in lab.

Types of changes

  • Chore (a change that does not modify the application functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • Documentation updates are needed, and have been made accordingly.
  • I have added and/or updated tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
  • My changes include a database migration.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added the ability to check and display whether RPC encryption enforcement is enabled for a Certification Authority on a target host.

@JonasBK JonasBK self-assigned this Aug 6, 2025
@JonasBK JonasBK added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 6, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 6, 2025

Walkthrough

A new property, RPCEncryptionEnforced, was added to the CARegistryData class to store the result of an RPC encryption enforcement check. Additionally, a new method, RPCEncryptionEnforced, was introduced in the CertAbuseProcessor class to determine if RPC encryption is enforced for a specific Certification Authority by inspecting a registry flag.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
CARegistryData Property Addition
src/CommonLib/OutputTypes/CARegistryData.cs
Added public property RPCEncryptionEnforced of type BoolRegistryAPIResult to the CARegistryData class.
CertAbuseProcessor Method Addition
src/CommonLib/Processors/CertAbuseProcessor.cs
Added public method RPCEncryptionEnforced to check registry for RPC encryption enforcement for a given CA.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant CertAbuseProcessor
    participant Registry
    Caller->>CertAbuseProcessor: RPCEncryptionEnforced(target, caName)
    CertAbuseProcessor->>Registry: Read InterfaceFlags from SYSTEM\...\<caName>
    Registry-->>CertAbuseProcessor: Return InterfaceFlags value
    CertAbuseProcessor-->>Caller: Return BoolRegistryAPIResult (enforced or not)
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Poem

A bunny hopped through code today,
To check if RPC is locked away.
With a flag in the registry,
Encryption enforced—now plain to see!
New methods bloom, new data grows,
In the warren where the logic flows.
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac60f8f and c230595.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/CommonLib/OutputTypes/CARegistryData.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/CommonLib/Processors/CertAbuseProcessor.cs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/CommonLib/OutputTypes/CARegistryData.cs (1)

11-11: LGTM! Property follows established patterns.

The new RPCEncryptionEnforced property follows the same pattern as other registry result properties in the class and has a clear, descriptive name indicating its purpose.

src/CommonLib/Processors/CertAbuseProcessor.cs (1)

280-305: LGTM! Method implementation follows established patterns.

The new RPCEncryptionEnforced method follows the same implementation pattern as other similar registry checking methods in the class (IsUserSpecifiesSanEnabled, RoleSeparationEnabled). It properly handles error cases, null values, and uses appropriate bitwise operations to check the RPC encryption enforcement flag (0x00000200).

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch esc11

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant