Skip to content

Conversation

jasperfirecai2
Copy link

@jasperfirecai2 jasperfirecai2 commented Apr 2, 2025

Following a discussion in the discord, it seems that cinf bonus is not being correctly multiplied together. It is especially apparent at lower numbers. and c3 doesn't apply any bonus at all a c2 = 0;

due to calculating the c2 and c3 bonuses different in the cinf math, the c2 bonus is off by a factor of +100.

This is a suggested fix, to make it clear how the math actually should work if c2 and c3 are meant to multiply. Assuming totalward = 0 means 'add nothing to multiplier' and not 'multiply by 0'.

Images to show the disparity at low and high numbers

image
image
(should be -100), +1500% = x16

@jasperfirecai2
Copy link
Author

note that if this is the intended method of stacking, the wording for cinf should probably be more clear

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant