Skip to content

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Contributor

@per1234 per1234 commented Sep 12, 2025

The "Check npm" template provides actions and a GitHub Actions workflow used to check for problems with a project's npm configuration files.

In addition to the package.json file previously used, we are now using an .npmrc configuration file. It will be useful to have some validation for this file. npm provides a config fix command which automatically fixes any problems that are detected with the npm configuration. In addition to using it for that purpose, it can also serve as a check by running the command via the GitHub Actions workflow, then checking for any diff.

Beyond the automated fixes, it is hoped that the parsing of the configuration that npm must perform to check for any needed fixes provides a basic validation of the configuration. Unfortunately npm's parser is extremely lenient, so the validation is not at all comprehensive. However, it is probably better than nothing, simple to implement, and no alternatives were found.

The "Check npm" template provides actions and a GitHub Actions workflow used to check for problems with a project's npm
configuration files.

In addition to the `package.json` file previously used, we are now using an `.npmrc` configuration file. It will be
useful to have some validation for this file. npm provides a `config fix` command which automatically fixes any problems
that are detected with the npm configuration. In addition to using it for that purpose, it can also serve as a check by
running the command via the GitHub Actions workflow, then checking for any diff.

Beyond the automated fixes, it is hoped that the parsing of the configuration that npm must perform to check for any
needed fixes provides a basic validation of the configuration. Unfortunately npm's parser is extremely lenient, so the
validation is not at all comprehensive. However, it is probably better than nothing, simple to implement, and no
alternatives were found.
@per1234 per1234 self-assigned this Sep 12, 2025
@per1234 per1234 added type: enhancement Proposed improvement topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure labels Sep 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.33%. Comparing base (4de008f) to head (2506adc).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #938   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.33%   83.33%           
=======================================
  Files           1        1           
  Lines         180      180           
=======================================
  Hits          150      150           
  Misses         19       19           
  Partials       11       11           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 83.33% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@per1234 per1234 merged commit 5adef71 into arduino:main Sep 12, 2025
63 of 75 checks passed
@per1234 per1234 deleted the check-npm branch September 12, 2025 19:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant