Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Coming soon: The Renovate bot (GitHub App) will be renamed to Mend. PRs from Renovate will soon appear from 'Mend'. Learn more here.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
esbuild 0.25.9 -> 0.25.10 age confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild (esbuild)

v0.25.10

Compare Source

  • Fix a panic in a minification edge case (#​4287)

    This release fixes a panic due to a null pointer that could happen when esbuild inlines a doubly-nested identity function and the final result is empty. It was fixed by emitting the value undefined in this case, which avoids the panic. This case must be rare since it hasn't come up until now. Here is an example of code that previously triggered the panic (which only happened when minifying):

    function identity(x) { return x }
    identity({ y: identity(123) })
  • Fix @supports nested inside pseudo-element (#​4265)

    When transforming nested CSS to non-nested CSS, esbuild is supposed to filter out pseudo-elements such as ::placeholder for correctness. The CSS nesting specification says the following:

    The nesting selector cannot represent pseudo-elements (identical to the behavior of the ':is()' pseudo-class). We’d like to relax this restriction, but need to do so simultaneously for both ':is()' and '&', since they’re intentionally built on the same underlying mechanisms.

    However, it seems like this behavior is different for nested at-rules such as @supports, which do work with pseudo-elements. So this release modifies esbuild's behavior to now take that into account:

    /* Original code */
    ::placeholder {
      color: red;
      body & { color: green }
      @​supports (color: blue) { color: blue }
    }
    
    /* Old output (with --supported:nesting=false) */
    ::placeholder {
      color: red;
    }
    body :is() {
      color: green;
    }
    @​supports (color: blue) {
       {
        color: blue;
      }
    }
    
    /* New output (with --supported:nesting=false) */
    ::placeholder {
      color: red;
    }
    body :is() {
      color: green;
    }
    @​supports (color: blue) {
      ::placeholder {
        color: blue;
      }
    }

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to e79e629 in 41 seconds. Click for details.
  • Reviewed 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 1 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 draft comments. View those below.
  • Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. package.json:200
  • Draft comment:
    Bump esbuild from 0.25.9 to 0.25.10 to include a fix for a minification panic edge-case. The change appears safe.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 0% <= threshold 50% None

Workflow ID: wflow_Pgng57uUdQnuf1yS

You can customize Ellipsis by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants