Skip to content

Conversation

@skmcgrail
Copy link
Member

@skmcgrail skmcgrail commented Nov 5, 2025

Description of changes:

Updates the fuzzing and x509 batch buildspecs to use the new container images for fuzzing. Fuzzing and x509 remain as webhook initiated batch builds, and there are no plans to migrate this to GitHub runner based actions.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and the ISC license.

@skmcgrail skmcgrail requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2025 21:24
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 78.25%. Comparing base (7187ab5) to head (2563638).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2804      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.25%   78.25%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         683      683              
  Lines      117182   117182              
  Branches    16475    16474       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        91703    91698       -5     
- Misses      24598    24602       +4     
- Partials      881      882       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@skmcgrail skmcgrail changed the title Use new images for fuzzing Use new images for fuzzing and x509 Nov 5, 2025
@skmcgrail skmcgrail force-pushed the gh-fuzzing-images branch 2 times, most recently from 3a2675c to c5dd744 Compare November 5, 2025 23:44
@skmcgrail skmcgrail merged commit 5a0f20b into aws:main Nov 11, 2025
401 of 411 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants