Skip to content

Conversation

@gabrielbazan7
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gabegattis
Copy link

This is going to require a lot more work than just updating the version number in the package.json. There are api changes and functional changes in secp256k1.

Previously, I was working on #60. I was making my own version of that PR based on fanatid's changes, but I never finished it because it was not a priority.

If we are going to do this, I am going to need to stop working on my current work and go back to finish this.

Why do we need to update these bindings for copay?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants