Research and possible start of a fix for issue 1337 #1350
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thx for contrib, don't have a solution out of the head, but will look into it. |
Karinza38
approved these changes
Nov 27, 2024
|
@fretje Will add this now into the man branch, I will copy the code since PR has confilicts, or if you want to make new clean PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This includes a test for issue #1337
And possible part of a fix, but I stumbled upon another roadblock.
With the current fix, I was able to get the foreign keys of the
Emailentities filled properly with their respective custId, and even inserted/merged into the database, but then an exception is thrown when trying to read the output from that operation, asDbContext.Set<Email>().FromSqlRaw()is used for that, andDbContext.Set<TEntity>isn't supported for owned types.Not sure how to tackle this... but I thought I'd throw this out there already in case someone else has ideas?