-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 4.6k
simple fix for division by zero in METTesterPostProcessor
#49102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
METTesterPostProcessor
|
type bug-fix |
|
cms-bot internal usage |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49102/46337
|
|
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master. It involves the following packages:
@ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @nothingface0, @rseidita can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
|
Why have two open PRs and not just converge on the already open one? |
because the currently open PR is not converging and IMHO it's a horrible solution. |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
just for the record the fix is effective, see e.g. https://cern.ch/28t8e (
|
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49102/46343
|
|
Pull request #49102 was updated. @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @nothingface0, @rseidita can you please check and sign again. |
|
please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
#49082 has been approved, so this one can be closed |
I would appreciate the rational behind that. |
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-49102/46394 |
|
Pull request #49102 was updated. @cmsbuild, @ctarricone, @gabrielmscampos, @nothingface0, @rseidita can you please check and sign again. |
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
|
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
|
As far as I understood, this PR should not be needed anymore. Are there any arguments to have it merged, or can we have it closed? |

resolves #49073
PR description:
SImple fix for #49073, by acting on , #48745 (comment) avoiding division by zero, alternative to #49082.
PR validation:
runs fine.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
N/A