Skip to content

Conversation

@vuillaut
Copy link
Member

This is an addition to the documentation to display as a schema what are the Hillas parameters:

annotated_hillas_parameters

@maxnoe
Copy link
Member

maxnoe commented Oct 21, 2025

Nice!

Does it also work in TelescopeFrame? As we are about to drop support for image parameters in CamereaFrame #2396

@sfegan
Copy link

sfegan commented Oct 22, 2025

The way you have drawn the length and width is confusing since it shows them as a "diameter" rather than a "radius". For example, you note that the length is 0.26m but the blue line that you indicate as the length is 0.52m in length. I would suggest you stop the blue and green lines at the center of the ellipse to avoid confusion.

@vuillaut
Copy link
Member Author

Nice!

Does it also work in TelescopeFrame? As we are about to drop support for image parameters in CamereaFrame #2396

Given a few changes, yes seems to work fine

hillas_annotated_event

Sall I wait for #2396 to be merged?

@vuillaut
Copy link
Member Author

With the latest fixes

hillas_annotated_event

@maxnoe
Copy link
Member

maxnoe commented Oct 22, 2025

You can see the rendered docs page here now:

https://ctapipe--2868.org.readthedocs.build/en/2868/auto_examples/visualization/hillas.html#sphx-glr-auto-examples-visualization-hillas-py

The images are very small. I think because it tries to show both images side-by-side because they come from the same "cell".

Could you split the two graphics into two cells? Or do we really need the standard camera display here?

@vuillaut
Copy link
Member Author

@maxnoe thanks for the review
The 2nd plot was a leftover from a late comparison test I did sorry, I just removed it, the figure should now appear much bigger.

@vuillaut
Copy link
Member Author

@maxnoe shall I switch already to TelescopeFrame()?

@maxnoe
Copy link
Member

maxnoe commented Oct 22, 2025

@maxnoe shall I switch already to TelescopeFrame()?

Yes please. TelescopeFrame is the default for a long time now. We are only talking about dropping the legacy support for CameraFrame parameters.

@ctao-sonarqube
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants