Skip to content

Conversation

@gschwefer
Copy link

Pull request implementing issue #224 . Solution as described there, the weighted quantile function is custom.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 98.00% and project coverage change: +0.15 🎉

Comparison is base (52e1297) 92.46% compared to head (b4783af) 92.62%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #225      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.46%   92.62%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines        2005     2048      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits         1854     1897      +43     
  Misses        151      151              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pyirf/cuts.py 96.82% <94.73%> (+0.99%) ⬆️
pyirf/tests/test_cuts.py 99.09% <100.00%> (+0.31%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Bins with less events than this number are replaced with ``fill_value``
"""

if weights is None:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd prefer it (and it's probably also faster) if the weights=None case would use the existing code instead of the weighted_quantile method with weights=1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants