Skip to content

Conversation

puzzledpolymath
Copy link
Contributor

🔍 What was changed

  • Added new column type support for Snowflake and ULID identifiers

🔔 Note

Wait until the following PR is merged and released.

@puzzledpolymath puzzledpolymath added the status:code review The pull request needs review. label Jul 16, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.83%. Comparing base (35890d8) to head (1946184).
Report is 5 commits behind head on 4.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                4.x     #117   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     91.83%   91.83%           
  Complexity      314      314           
=========================================
  Files            38       38           
  Lines           808      808           
=========================================
  Hits            742      742           
  Misses           66       66           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@roxblnfk roxblnfk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add cycle/database : ^2.15 into composer.json

@puzzledpolymath
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's add cycle/database : ^2.15 into composer.json

I'll leave it up to you to merge

@roxblnfk roxblnfk merged commit f996d3e into 4.x Jul 22, 2025
12 checks passed
@roxblnfk roxblnfk deleted the support-new-identifier-columns branch July 22, 2025 06:19
@roxblnfk roxblnfk changed the title Support new identifier columns Add hints for ULID and snowflake column types Jul 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:code review The pull request needs review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants