[Checkbox][WIP] New features #2010
Conversation
prudho
added
type/feat
|
I like the approach to make |
| .ui.@{color}.toggle.checkbox input:checked ~ label::before, | ||
| .ui.@{color}.slider.checkbox input:checked ~ label::before { | ||
| background-color: @color !important; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Beside the variable name: Any chance to increase specificity without using !important? (Haven't tested myself yet!)
| .ui.@{color}.toggle.checkbox input:checked ~ label::before, | |
| .ui.@{color}.slider.checkbox input:checked ~ label::before { | |
| background-color: @color !important; | |
| } | |
| .ui.ui.@{color}.toggle.checkbox input:checked ~ label::before, | |
| .ui.ui.@{color}.slider.checkbox input:checked ~ label::before { | |
| background-color: @c; | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tried .ui.ui and .ui.ui.ui, but still need that !important to work... 😞
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's because there is an existing !important at
.ui.toggle.checkbox input:checked ~ label:before {
background-color: #2185D0 !important;
}We would need to remove the !important from there too
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you check the checkbox.less there are still a few !important for toggle and slider which are causing this. This PR is a good chance to get rid of them as well 😉
|
Icon instead of checkmark is doable:
But it will require more tests and code than previous modifications. Should I create another PR ? |
Up to you 😉 Just make sure that each PR is based on current develop (or do everything in one PR) |
|
I have a suggestion/idea/question: https://fomantic-ui.com/elements/icon.html#bordered-colored However, a checkbox/radio always has an "outline" or is "bordered". Your new feature does only make the outline/border more prominent/bold/colored Opinion? |
|
Yeah I don't know how to really name it, since I "copy" class name from another framework. And I struck to find another class name for a no bordered checkbox as well (well the border disapear when checked). |
|
I've added the |
| /* Checked */ | ||
| .ui.checkbox input:checked ~ .box:after, | ||
| .ui.checkbox input:checked ~ label:after { | ||
| .ui.checkbox:not(.icon) input:checked ~ .box:after, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As we removed the .box selectors by #2049 you may merge the current develop into this PR and remove the .box afterwwards
| @checkboxCheckTop: 0; | ||
| @checkboxCheckLeft: 0; | ||
| @checkboxCheckSize: @checkboxSize; | ||
| @checkboxIconCheckFontSize: 12px; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We have the @{size}CheckboxSize variables already, you may reuse them (i didn't test 🙄 )
Also, please use em instead of px
| line-height: @checkboxLineHeight; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .ui.icon.checkbox input:not(:checked) ~ label i { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That means, that any icon inside the label (and not supposed to be used for the "check" icon) will vanish.
If we keep this logic, this would mean to define that icon.checkbox variations do not support Icons in the label itself
Just a thought (I don't request the following):
What about using the icon font family on icon.checkbox instead, so dont have to deal with a separate i tag? That would probably also fix the sizing issues and is the same approach as the current check icon.
Infact, this approach would mean to adjust all icons selectors which would be quite a lot.
A long time back we discussed data attributes "data-icon" which would be independent of the tag and could be reused here (yes, that would be a separate PR and huge breaking change....)
lubber-de
removed
the
state/awaiting-reviews
2 participants
Description
Following #2009, I think that indeed checkboxes need some fancy new features too. So I open this PR as a draft and discussion topic.
For now, I just add
coloredandoutlinecheckboxes too see what it's possible to implement.The others options i'm thinking are:
Transitionare paving the way).What do you guys think about this ?
Testcase
JSFiddle
Screenshot
Related issues
#393, #550, #2009