-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 112
xyce: Add at 7.9 #6021
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
xyce: Add at 7.9 #6021
Conversation
Not gonna lie, this was awful to build. Trilinos in particular is a mess. Eventually I was able to get it all working though, with the caveat that I haven't tested it on a parallel filesystem (though since parallel fs is usually a high-availability server thing, I'm pretty sure that doesn't matter) |
I see the checks - will add monitoring & fix the .a's. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a couple things besides the static libs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In the xyce
package, I notice that it looks like there's a directory missing in the paths, i.e. it installs /usr/share/XyceRest.py
instead of /usr/share/xyce/XyceRest.py
. The path /usr/doc/README.TXT
also looks strange to me.
I notice that they say that the CMake build is experimental; maybe it will install to the correct locations if we use the old autotools
build system?
The Xyce autotools build tries to find Trilinos by looking for Makefile.export files for its various packages. These don't appear to be available when building Trilinos with cmake, as I'm doing currently. Note that cmake is the recommended way to build Trilinos; their website no longer provides instructions for building with anything else. If the choice here is between building Trilinos with an old, potentially unmaintained build system and building Xyce with a beta build system, I'm in favor of building Xyce with cmake and manually fixing the couple of odd install paths. Thoughts? EDIT: I see it's a lot of problematic paths. Looking for solutions within the constraints of the build system. If all else fails I can do a more manual install, but let's hope it doesn't get that messy. |
Summary
Initial inclusion of the Xyce parallel analog circuit simulator. Xyce performs many of the same functions as ngspice, but is optimized for highly parallel execution. This makes it possible to run simulations on much larger circuits, or even distribute simulation across many compute devices.
Test Plan
Checklist