Fix typo from commited to committed

2016/2016-01-12-SiteCompli-2.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ It is clear via the directory structure, comments and contents of the files (exa
 
 It is a direct, literal copy of our work, albeit several versions old. Regardless, it contains content that has been unchanged and poses a direct intellectual property and security risk to our business.
 
-The current, legitimate copy of our codebase is current hosted on a different git provider, but I have commited a temporary copy to our private company repository on GitHub. The location of our copy is hosted at [private].
+The current, legitimate copy of our codebase is current hosted on a different git provider, but I have committed a temporary copy to our private company repository on GitHub. The location of our copy is hosted at [private].
 
 User rishiphp0312 must immediately delete the entire repository located at https://github.com/rishiphp0312/rishisitebuilding/ and any local copies of the identified code.
 

2016/2016-01-12-SiteCompli.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ It is clear via the directory structure and contents of the files (example: http
 
 It is a direct, literal copy of our work, albeit several versions old. Regardless, it contains content that has been unchanged and poses a direct intellectual property and security risk to our business.
 
-The current, legitimate copy of our codebase is current hosted on a different git provider, but I have commited a temporary copy to our private company repository on GitHub. The location of our copy is hosted at [private].
+The current, legitimate copy of our codebase is current hosted on a different git provider, but I have committed a temporary copy to our private company repository on GitHub. The location of our copy is hosted at [private].
 
 User rishiphp0312 must immediately delete the entire repository located at https://github.com/rishiphp0312/sitebuildemailnyc/ and any local copies of the identified code.
 

2016/2016-12-05-youzu.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 **Are you the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf?**  
-yes,this project is commited from my account lambp (this sign in user )
+yes,this project is committed from my account lambp (this sign in user )
 9 months ago I had remvoed this project from my account lambp ,but user bluefan fork this project.
 
 **What work was allegedly infringed? If possible, please provide a URL:**  

2017/2017-05-22-ChengduPinguoTechCo.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ I have read and understand GitHub's Guide to Filing a DMCA Notice. I swear, unde
 
 My name is [Private], an programmer in Chengdu Pinguo Tech Co, Ltd., which focus on studying real-time image processing technoloies.
 
-Last year, I uploaded our company's private code in Github . Because I am not familiar with Github website setting, I made a mistake to put it on the public website (https://github.com/pinguo) as public code. However, it is private code which belongs to our company. I was intended to put it on our private website （https://github.com/PGWireless）. What's worse , I found that 2 subscribers (https://github.com/Honsec/PGSkinPrettifyEngine、https://github.com/alemic/PGSkinPrettifyEngine ) have forked our code. Recently we found that the same SDK occured in the market and someone use it to sale. It has already caused a huge loss to our company and our customers.
+Last year, I uploaded our company's private code in Github . Because I am not familiar with Github website setting, I made a mistake to put it on the public website (https://github.com/pinguo) as public code. However, it is private code which belongs to our company. I was intended to put it on our private website （https://github.com/PGWireless）. What's worse , I found that 2 subscribers (https://github.com/Honsec/PGSkinPrettifyEngine、https://github.com/alemic/PGSkinPrettifyEngine ) have forked our code. Recently we found that the same SDK occurred in the market and someone use it to sale. It has already caused a huge loss to our company and our customers.
 
 Thus, I hope Github can help us to delete our private code ASAP on the website to avoid wide spread.
 

2017/2017-11-02-proj.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ The source code was provided to the user chetanm123 in private and
 trust because chetanm was working on this project as a frelancer. The
 sourcode is clouse source so there is no URL to provide the original
 copyrighted work. Based on the git history you can see that, I created
-and commited this code.  
+and committed this code.  
 
 
 **What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file,

2018/2018-05-04-MatchCounterNotice.md

@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ information from Match Group’s servers".
 
 This is a patently false representation of the way Pofapi accesses its
 content -- as can be plainly seen by even a basic code analysis of any
-version of Pofapi ever commited to that repository, Pofapi has not, nor
+version of Pofapi ever committed to that repository, Pofapi has not, nor
 has it ever "bypassed the POF network", nor does it "improperly access
 their backend". Furthermore, nor does it access proprietary or
 restricted information not available in any other browser. Furthmore,

2019/07/2019-07-23-RadioLib.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 I am the copyright owner.  
 
 **Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.**   
-The work in question is a C/C++ library RadioLib (available at https://github.com/jgromes/RadioLib). It is an embedded driver for various wireless communication modules. Amongst the supported wireless modules is the SX126x family of LoRa radio modules. It has recently occured to me that a different GitHub project (https://github.com/tinytronix/SX126x) is using substantial parts of RadioLib code without any mention of RadioLib or its original license. RadioLib is licensed under the MIT License, which clearly states that: "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software." I firmly believe that this use of RadioLib is in violation of its license.  
+The work in question is a C/C++ library RadioLib (available at https://github.com/jgromes/RadioLib). It is an embedded driver for various wireless communication modules. Amongst the supported wireless modules is the SX126x family of LoRa radio modules. It has recently occurred to me that a different GitHub project (https://github.com/tinytronix/SX126x) is using substantial parts of RadioLib code without any mention of RadioLib or its original license. RadioLib is licensed under the MIT License, which clearly states that: "The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software." I firmly believe that this use of RadioLib is in violation of its license.  
 
 **What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository’s URL:**   
 https://github.com/tinytronix/SX126x/blob/master/SX126x.cpp   

2020/04/2020-04-24-essentialmode-counternotice.md

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ We have already explained to GitHub how [private] attempt to license his code to
 We found out that the web archive website had indexed his old website that he no longer uses, http://essentialmode.com.
 Web archive link: http://web.archive.org/web/20180516175223/https://docs.essentialmode.com/#license
 
-So around 2018-05-16 according to his website essentialmode v4 (and also some some versions at v5) were in fact licensed under nolicense **and not AGPLv3**. ESX-Org and its project es_extended was initialy commited to in 2017-06-31. So that's proof that [private] is lying about the AGPLv3 license. In his old website you can get a download link to his old version of essentialmode v4 that also had no license. ESX was developed around the time when essentialmode v4 was released to the public. The license he can enforce on us is nolicense and not AGPLv3.
+So around 2018-05-16 according to his website essentialmode v4 (and also some some versions at v5) were in fact licensed under nolicense **and not AGPLv3**. ESX-Org and its project es_extended was initialy committed to in 2017-06-31. So that's proof that [private] is lying about the AGPLv3 license. In his old website you can get a download link to his old version of essentialmode v4 that also had no license. ESX was developed around the time when essentialmode v4 was released to the public. The license he can enforce on us is nolicense and not AGPLv3.
 
 Again if there's anything we can provide to prove what I've mentioned then do not hesitate to contact, thanks a lot guys!
 [private]  

2021/01/2021-01-19-ebupt.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ We developed the bi project for China Mobile Migu Reading Company.In this page h
 and.
 The text "China Mobile Mobile Reading" on the screenshoot is "China Mobile Mobile Reading" in English. The text "Eastcom-BUPT Information Technology Co. Ltd" and it is "EBUPT" for short. You can check my identity via the suffix of my email address.    
 
-The code was commited by one of our team member, but it's not permitted and broke the rules of our code management. When we found it ,we contacted him and he had removed the repository from his own git repositories.But we found  there was other people who forked the reposiory to his own repositories(https://github.com/liveqmock/bi). Since he did not leave his email or open the issues,we couldn't  conact him to remove the repository.  
+The code was committed by one of our team member, but it's not permitted and broke the rules of our code management. When we found it ,we contacted him and he had removed the repository from his own git repositories.But we found  there was other people who forked the reposiory to his own repositories(https://github.com/liveqmock/bi). Since he did not leave his email or open the issues,we couldn't  conact him to remove the repository.  
 
 The original git repository was belong to [private]. The git repository needed to be removed is https://github.com/liveqmock/bi.  
 

2021/01/2021-01-25-qatoolkit.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ BP Mobile LLC owns all exclusive rights to QAToolkit (QAT).
 QAT is a proprietary software kit which was developed for internal use and not designed for distribution of any kind.  
 It has come to our attention that in 2018 QAT was placed on GitHub by user <fvonk>: https://github.com/fvonk/qat  
 As the GitHub repository is synchronized with our corporate storage, all updates that have been made on our side automatically became available to public - they are dispalyed on 
-GitHub as commited by our developers.  
+GitHub as committed by our developers.  
 Thus we claim that QAT was accessed and distributed without authorization of the rightholder. 
 
 **Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.**

2022/04/2022-04-22-nitro-sniper.md

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ I am the copyright holder of this project. This project is Unlicensed, which mak
 **Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.**
 
 The project is located at [private]  
-There are very clear commits which were commited way before the offending repository existed.  
+There are very clear commits which were committed way before the offending repository existed.  
 The offender has downloaded the project, changed the details to link to their [private] and claimed the project as theirs.
 
 The repository holder has been contacted through an issue which they acknowledged previously. They had made the repository private but I had later discovered that they had made the repository public again.

2023/06/2023-06-30-anz.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ GitHub
 
 **Please describe the nature of your copyright ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.**
 
-As specified in Github Support ticket [private] secrets and code belonging to ANZ bank have been commited to a user's public repository in Github.com
+As specified in Github Support ticket [private] secrets and code belonging to ANZ bank have been committed to a user's public repository in Github.com
 
 **Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where it is posted online.**
 

2023/09/2023-09-18-beijing-ruaho-technologies.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ GitHub
 
 **Please describe the nature of your copyright ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.**
 
-the 'https://github.com/zhanght86/qhbx' was first commited by [private] ([private]) and all contents commited by [private] .This project is a private code , cloned by gitbub user zhanght86 , please remove it ,thanks.  
+the 'https://github.com/zhanght86/qhbx' was first committed by [private] ([private]) and all contents committed by [private] .This project is a private code , cloned by gitbub user zhanght86 , please remove it ,thanks.  
 I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into consideration  
 I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusíve right that is allegedly infringed.
 

2023/09/2023-09-20-beijing-ruaho-technologies.md

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ GitHub
 
 **Please describe the nature of your copyright ownership or authorization to act on the owner's behalf.**
 
-the 'https://github.com/Geidalaodicha/qhbx' was first commited by [private] ([private]) and all contents commited by [private].This project is a private code , cloned by gitbub user [private] , please remove it ,thanks.  
+the 'https://github.com/Geidalaodicha/qhbx' was first committed by [private] ([private]) and all contents committed by [private].This project is a private code , cloned by gitbub user [private] , please remove it ,thanks.  
 I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into consideration  
 I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusíve right that is allegedly infringed.
 

2024/08/2024-08-22-dnsresolver.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ I am the [private] of the repository of [private] own. [private] have written th
 This is the copied work: https://github.com/Harsh-Khandelwal60/DNS-Resolver  
 This is [private] own repository: https://github.com/GuyEternal/DNSResolver
 
-The thing is the person who has copied [private] code has changed the commit history to 6 or 7 months ago to make it look like he commited it long ago, but actually as you can clearly see it looks totally copied from [private] repo. i.e. GuyEternal/DNSResolver
+The thing is the person who has copied [private] code has changed the commit history to 6 or 7 months ago to make it look like he committed it long ago, but actually as you can clearly see it looks totally copied from [private] repo. i.e. GuyEternal/DNSResolver
 
 **What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or if the entire repository, the repository’s URL.**