Skip to content

Conversation

@jmisur
Copy link

@jmisur jmisur commented Jul 24, 2025

What:
Changed function audit.enable_tracking to use after insert trigger.

Why:
In case of using ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE as an upsert mechanism, for a conflicting record, the before insert trigger receives 3 events:

  • INSERT
  • UPDATE
  • UPDATE

This makes 3 records in audit table and it's not what we want.

The change to after insert makes sure that record operation succeeds first and only then emits an event for audit table. In this case it's only one: UPDATE.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated audit tracking to trigger after data changes instead of before.
    • Adjusted audit trigger behavior for improved consistency with row-level operations.

What:
Changed function `audit.enable_tracking` to use after insert trigger.

Why:
In case of using `ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE` as an upsert mechanism, for a conflicting record, the before insert trigger receives 3 events:
- INSERT
- UPDATE
- UPDATE

This makes 3 records in audit table and it's not what we want.

The change to after insert makes sure that record operation succeeds first and only then emits an event for audit table. In this case it's only one: UPDATE.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Walkthrough

The SQL migration updates the audit trigger function to return null instead of the previous row value, and changes the audit trigger timing from BEFORE to AFTER for insert, update, and delete operations. These modifications affect the behavior and timing of audit logging in the database.

Changes

File Change Summary
drizzle/0002_classy_war_machine.sql Changed audit trigger function to return null; altered trigger timing from BEFORE to AFTER.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Poem

The audit log now waits its turn,
AFTER changes, it will learn.
No more rows returned, just null,
The trigger’s job is never dull.
In SQL fields where data flows,
The bunny hops, and audit grows!

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
drizzle/0002_classy_war_machine.sql (1)

88-90: Index definition uses the wrong column – will not speed up old_record_id look-ups

The second index is declared as

create index record_version_old_record_id 
    on audit.record_version (record_id)
    where old_record_id is not null;

It indexes record_id again instead of old_record_id, so queries filtering by old_record_id won’t benefit.

-create index record_version_old_record_id on audit.record_version (record_id)
+create index record_version_old_record_id on audit.record_version (old_record_id)

Recommend correcting before this migration is applied in production, otherwise you’ll need a follow-up migration to drop & recreate the index.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
drizzle/0002_classy_war_machine.sql (1)

160-167: Consider schema-qualified table reference in dynamic CREATE TRIGGER statement

%I on a regclass argument expands only the relation name, relying on search_path to resolve the schema.
If consumers call audit.enable_tracking('other_schema.my_table'::regclass) while search_path later points to a different schema containing a table with the same name, the trigger could be installed on the wrong relation.

You can make the SQL robust by extracting schema + relname and quoting both:

-declare
-    statement_row text = format('
-        create trigger audit_i_u_d
-            after insert or update or delete
-            on %I
+declare
+    statement_row text = format('
+        create trigger audit_i_u_d
+            after insert or update or delete
+            on %I.%I
             for each row
             execute procedure audit.insert_update_delete_trigger();',
-                                $1
+                                (select nspname from pg_class c join pg_namespace n on n.oid = relnamespace where c.oid = $1),
+                                (select relname from pg_class where oid = $1)
              );

This keeps behaviour identical while eliminating any search_path dependency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3c1f69 and 85150a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • drizzle/0002_classy_war_machine.sql (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
drizzle/0002_classy_war_machine.sql (1)

136-137: Return value for AFTER trigger is now correct – looks good

For AFTER-row triggers the return value is ignored, so changing the body to return null; is the safest choice.
No further action required.

old_record_jsonb;

return coalesce(new, old);
return null;
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does this change do

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"After insert" trigger doesn't need to return anything, since the record was already written.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants