Skip to content

Conversation

ripecosta
Copy link
Contributor

Why am I submitting this PR

This PR updates dependencies and patches a number of known security vulnerabilities.
Before:
image
After:
image

Does it fix an existing ticket?

No

Checklist

  • only relevant code is changed (make a diff before you submit the PR)
  • do no modify the version in package.json or CHANGELOG.md
  • tests are included and pass: yarn test (see details here)
  • documentation is changed or added

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Apr 20, 2025

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updated@​esbuild/​aix-ppc64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​android-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​darwin-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​darwin-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​freebsd-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​freebsd-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-arm@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-ia32@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-loong64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-mips64el@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-ppc64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-riscv64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-s390x@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​linux-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​openbsd-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​openbsd-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​sunos-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​win32-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​win32-ia32@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​win32-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003688100
Updated@​esbuild/​netbsd-arm64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003787100
Updated@​esbuild/​netbsd-x64@​0.25.0 ⏵ 0.25.51001003788100
Updatednode-releases@​2.0.18 ⏵ 2.0.191001004179100
Updatedis-unicode-supported@​2.0.0 ⏵ 2.1.067 +110070 +151100
Updatedjsonify@​0.0.0 ⏵ 0.0.167 +610088 +1151100
Addedhas-property-descriptors@​1.0.2671007851100
Addedset-function-length@​1.2.2661008351100
Addedobject-keys@​1.1.1671009151100
Addedes-define-property@​1.0.1671008151100
Addedhas-symbols@​1.1.0671008151100
Updatedjson-stable-stringify@​1.0.1 ⏵ 1.3.067100100 +153 +1100
Updatedis-core-module@​2.15.0 ⏵ 2.16.167 +110080 +153100
See 196 more rows in the dashboard

View full report

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.29%. Comparing base (398b9ce) to head (bd2d9c7).
Report is 42 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1132      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.35%   95.29%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        1918     1976      +58     
==========================================
+ Hits         1829     1883      +54     
- Misses         89       93       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@ripecosta ripecosta force-pushed the rc/updates branch 3 times, most recently from fff36f3 to 69a68cd Compare May 13, 2025 15:45
@ripecosta ripecosta force-pushed the rc/updates branch 2 times, most recently from bd4f5ed to af7562a Compare May 28, 2025 20:48
@ripecosta ripecosta force-pushed the rc/updates branch 3 times, most recently from 5577290 to 9f8c228 Compare June 8, 2025 12:46
@ripecosta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @karellm can I get a review on this PR when you have the chance? Appreciate it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants