Skip to content

Conversation

@intojhanurag
Copy link
Contributor

Fix: #3085

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from dsimansk and nainaz November 1, 2025 09:30
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 1, 2025
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Hi @intojhanurag. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 20.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 60.11%. Comparing base (83ea554) to head (9819610).
⚠️ Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
cmd/invoke.go 20.00% 3 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3164      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.37%   60.11%   +0.73%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines       13500    13522      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         8016     8129     +113     
+ Misses       4540     4422     -118     
- Partials      944      971      +27     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-tests 41.64% <20.00%> (+1.42%) ⬆️
integration-tests 54.65% <20.00%> (+1.66%) ⬆️
unit-tests 46.70% <20.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@intojhanurag
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @gauron99 , Can you take a look on this one , if you have a moment ?

@gauron99
Copy link
Contributor

gauron99 commented Nov 2, 2025

@lkingland I think we should actually promote the single case in both format (--format) and templates (--template) instead? (internally we support both with singular AND plural and we just overwrite the plural in cli)
Basically the other way around than this PR.

WDYT?

@lkingland
Copy link
Member

Yes. I agree. Plurality is not easily understood for folks with english as a second language, so I would suggest we accept both in the CLI, but be strict in the "core", accepting only the singular.

It will be so nice to have this standardized!

@intojhanurag
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @gauron99 , what I need to do ? Please lmk if anything .

@gauron99
Copy link
Contributor

gauron99 commented Nov 5, 2025

It would be good to implement the reverse as we discussed with Luke @intojhanurag

@intojhanurag
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @gauron99 , I reversed the logic .

@lkingland lkingland added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Nov 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@lkingland lkingland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 11, 2025
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Nov 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: intojhanurag, lkingland

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 11, 2025
@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 64b6eae into knative:main Nov 11, 2025
39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

different func type args take different values for the same thing

3 participants