feat: for version command add fields

[huhouhua]

Ref: #17467

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @huhouhua. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign johngmyers for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[huhouhua]

@hakman can you review my pull request 🙇

[ameukam]

/ok-to-test

[huhouhua]

/retest-required

[huhouhua]

/retest

[huhouhua]

@ameukam @hakman review the workflows

[hakman]

@huhouhua I think this is a good start, though we don't really use those binaries for anything other than debugging.
Releases are done using ko, so I would see this change more like this example: kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller#2955.

[huhouhua]

@huhouhua I think this is a good start, though we don't really use those binaries for anything other than debugging. Releases are done using ko, so I would see this change more like this example: kubernetes-sigs/aws-load-balancer-controller#2955.

Please confirm, do all the instructions using ko build in the makefile need to be modified

[hakman]

Ah, wait. Let's start with what you have now, but could you limit the changes to the kops binary in this PR?
Will try to look deeper later this week. Sorry for the initial confusion.

[huhouhua]

Ah, wait. Let's start with what you have now, but could you limit the changes to the kops binary in this PR? Will try to look deeper later this week. Sorry for the initial confusion.

Don't merge it yet, wait until it's confirmed later this week before modifying it

[hakman]

sure, no worries, need to add some comments for sure.

[huhouhua]

@hakman Is the command definition for kops release in the makefile?

[k8s-ci-robot]

@huhouhua: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
pull-kops-test	38e9a7a	link	true	/test pull-kops-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[huhouhua]

@hakman @justinsb Hi
I’d like to follow up on this PR. Please let me know if there’s anything that needs adjustment. Thank you

[k8s-ci-robot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.