Skip to content

Conversation

seuros
Copy link

@seuros seuros commented Mar 18, 2025

Description

rdoc class had support for a rdoc version that is 12 years old.

added https for the homepage.

Completed Tasks

  • I have read the Contributing Guide.
  • The pull request is complete (implemented / written).
  • Git commits have been cleaned up (squash WIP / revert commits).
  • I wrote tests and ran bundle exec rake locally (if code is attached to PR).

@lsegal
Copy link
Owner

lsegal commented May 9, 2025

This seems to fail all tests. Can you look into this?

@seuros
Copy link
Author

seuros commented May 9, 2025

Oh cool, i see you dropped legacy support for 2.6.

Do you think we should go at a safer zone to support only 3.2+ since anything before is EOL.

I have some yard plugins that work only in those version as they use edge gem or ruby features.

@lsegal
Copy link
Owner

lsegal commented May 10, 2025

(oops earlier comment was incorrect)

We would need to support ruby 2.x+ even if we can't run CI tests against them. CI doesn't represent what versions of ruby yard supports.

@seuros
Copy link
Author

seuros commented May 10, 2025

Remember that dropping support doesn't mean that version 2.x cannot install yard suddenly.

It just means that future versions won't be installable.

Those legacy versions don't even install in recent hardware like Apple Silicon, and lot it dependencies are EOL or have huge security problem (eg: openssl 3 compatibility).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants