-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Added Performance tests #158
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…nto performance_tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the fix :) This will help us get our toy agent to also give us better performance as we iterate on it.
The only "please fix this" feedback is to rebase the pr and make sure it works on main (check comment about a recent refactor).
Otherwise, things generally look solid!
…nto performance_tests
@PaliC I made the changes suggested |
@ParamThakkar123 I think something went wrong with rebasing as there are callsites to functions which are no longer in the file. I'd ensure that the tests added here work, and you should be good! Ensure that the tests that are added here work #158 Also you should be able to just use |
Sure @PaliC looking into it |
…nto performance_tests
@PaliC I made some code changes and ensured that they work locally. Can you place take a look? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a small comment you need to address, otherwise, it seems good to merge.
Thanks :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oops there's a bug
@PaliC so should I go ahead and make the changes i described in that thread ? |
Sure @PaliC Made the fixes. And I left the refactor as it is if that wasn't something we need right now |
Can you please take a look ? If any changes are needed further I'll make them right away. Else we are ready to merge probably :). Sorry for the bugs I unknowingly introduced in the code @PaliC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for dealing with the back and forth! It's good to merge :)
Thanks @PaliC 🫡 |
thanks for adding this @ParamThakkar123 |
Added performance tests instead of just correctness testing as given in issue #75 . Fix #75