fix: export runscript function #24
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (2)
29-30: Improve section header formattingThe "Commonjs" section header should be consistent with other headers in the document.
-Commonjs +### CommonJS
43-55: Enhance ESM example documentationWhile the example is correct, consider adding TypeScript-specific benefits or ESM-specific features to make the example more meaningful for TypeScript users.
Consider adding:
- Type annotations in the example
- ESM-specific features like top-level await
- A note about TypeScript configuration requirements
test/runscript.test.ts (1)
11-13: Consider expanding alias test coverageWhile the basic functionality test is good, consider adding more test cases to ensure the alias works identically in all scenarios.
Consider adding tests for:
- Error handling scenarios
- Timeout scenarios
- Different stdio configurations
- Platform-specific behaviors
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.md(3 hunks)src/index.ts(1 hunks)test/runscript.test.ts(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/index.ts
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/runscript.test.ts (2)
3-3: LGTM: Import statement includes both variants
The import statement correctly includes both the original runScript and the new runscript alias.
3-3: Verify the impact of the new alias across the codebase
Let's ensure the new alias doesn't affect existing code and is properly exported.
Also applies to: 11-13
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the implementation and usage to ensure there are no breaking changes.
Let me check the README to understand if the documentation reflects this alias.
The alias is properly implemented and documented
The verification shows that:
- The
runscriptalias is properly exported insrc/index.tsasexport const runscript = runScript - The alias is tested in
test/runscript.test.tswith a dedicated test case - The README.md explicitly documents the alias in the "Upgrade from 1.x to 2.x" section
- No conflicts or issues were found in the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the runscript alias implementation and usage
# Check if the alias is properly exported
ast-grep --pattern 'export { $_ as runscript }' src/
# Look for any existing uses of runscript in the codebase
rg -l 'runscript' --type ts --type js
# Check for potential naming conflicts
rg -l '\brunscript\b' --type ts --type js
Length of output: 208
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of the export in index.ts
cat src/index.ts
# Check the test file to understand usage patterns
cat test/runscript.test.ts
# Look for any documentation files
fd README.md
Length of output: 13048
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the documentation
cat README.md
Length of output: 2020
| ## Upgrade from 1.x to 2.x | ||
|
|
||
| ```js | ||
| // 1.x | ||
| // const runscript = require('runscript'); | ||
|
|
||
| // 2.x | ||
| const { runscript } = require('runscript'); | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Expand the upgrade guide with more details
The upgrade guide could be more comprehensive to help users transition smoothly.
Consider adding:
- Breaking changes list
- TypeScript type changes (if any)
- Example showing both default and named exports usage
- Migration steps for different environments (CommonJS, ESM, TypeScript)
[skip ci] ## [2.0.1](v2.0.0...v2.0.1) (2024-12-10) ### Bug Fixes * export runscript function ([#24](#24)) ([70395b2](70395b2))
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
runscriptpackage, including ESM and TypeScript formats.runscriptfor the existingrunScriptfunction.Bug Fixes
runscriptalias.Documentation