route: Update OWNERS #558
route: Update OWNERS #558
Conversation
WalkthroughUpdated Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: alebedev87 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pkg/route/OWNERS (2)
6-8: Casing nit: normalize handle for consistency.Others are lowercase; consider lowercasing Miciah for consistency.
- - Miciah + - miciahOptional: sort reviewers alphabetically to reduce churn in future diffs.
12-12: Same casing nit in approvers.Mirror the lowercase handle here as well.
- - Miciah + - miciah
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/route/OWNERS(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pkg/route/OWNERS (2)
13-15: LGTM: emeritus_approvers updates align with PR intent.Both were removed from active lists and added here. Looks correct.
1-17: OWNERS: handles exist and no leftover references
Confirmed GitHub logins resolve (Miciah, alebedev87, rikatz, smarterclayton, pweil-) and repo scan found no references to imcsk8 or pravisankar.
- OpenShift Ingress&DNS team added as reviewers and approvers. - `smarterclayton`, `pweil`, `rajatchopra` and `ironcladlou` moved to emeritus approvers. - `imcsk8`,`pravisankar` and `pecameron` removed from reviewers because they left Red Hat. - `jacobtanenbaum` removed from reviewers (not OpenShift Ingress&DNS team).
alebedev87
force-pushed
the
route-owners-update-2025
branch
from
2824411 to
355da16
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pkg/route/OWNERS (3)
3-12: Reviewer expansion goes beyond stated PR scope—please confirm each add.PR text mentions adding only Miciah, alebedev87, rikatz as reviewers; here we add 8 more. Confirm these folks are active for route and members of the OpenShift org.
If the intent was only the three additions, trim to the minimal set:
reviewers: - knobunc - - Miciah - - alebedev87 - - rikatz - - candita - - rfredette - - gcs278 - - davidesalerno - - bentito - - Thealisyed - - grzpiotrowski + - Miciah + - alebedev87 + - rikatz
3-12: Sort lists alphabetically and standardize handle casing (style).OWNERS lists are typically alphabetized to reduce churn; also prefer consistent lowercase handles unless a repo convention says otherwise.
Alphabetized reviewers example:
reviewers: - - knobunc - - Miciah - - alebedev87 - - rikatz - - candita - - rfredette - - gcs278 - - davidesalerno - - bentito - - Thealisyed - - grzpiotrowski + - alebedev87 + - bentito + - candita + - davidesalerno + - gcs278 + - grzpiotrowski + - knobunc + - Miciah + - rfredette + - rikatz + - ThealisyedAlso applies to: 14-24
25-29: Moving ironcladlou to emeritus wasn’t mentioned—verify intent before merging.This is a governance change; please confirm with maintainers or revert if unintentional.
Proposed revert if not intended:
emeritus_approvers: - smarterclayton - pweil- - rajatchopra - - ironcladlou
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pkg/route/OWNERS(1 hunks)
| - knobunc | ||
| - Miciah | ||
| - alebedev87 | ||
| - rikatz | ||
| - candita | ||
| - rfredette | ||
| - gcs278 | ||
| - davidesalerno | ||
| - bentito | ||
| - Thealisyed | ||
| - grzpiotrowski |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
Scope approvers to a small, trusted subset (align with PR intent).
Approvers gate merges. The PR description only calls out adding Miciah (and keeping existing leadership), but this change elevates 11 people to approvers. Recommend limiting approvers to a minimal set and adding others later as needed.
Apply this minimal change if that matches intent:
approvers:
- - knobunc
- - Miciah
- - alebedev87
- - rikatz
- - candita
- - rfredette
- - gcs278
- - davidesalerno
- - bentito
- - Thealisyed
- - grzpiotrowski
+ - knobunc
+ - Miciah🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -euo pipefail
echo "=== Repository root: $(pwd) ==="
echo
echo "=== Check file path ==="
if [ -f pkg/route/OWNERS ]; then
echo "FOUND: pkg/route/OWNERS"
else
echo "MISSING: pkg/route/OWNERS"
exit 0
fi
echo
echo "=== Show file with line numbers ==="
nl -ba pkg/route/OWNERS | sed -n '1,200p' || true
echo
echo "=== Show 'approvers:' block ==="
awk 'BEGIN{in=0} /approvers:/{in=1; print; next} in && /^$/{exit} in{print}' pkg/route/OWNERS || true
echo
echo "=== Git log for this file (last 10 commits) ==="
git --no-pager log --pretty=format:'%h %ad %an %s' --date=short -n 10 -- pkg/route/OWNERS || true
echo
echo "=== Diff vs origin/main (if available), else HEAD^..HEAD ==="
if git rev-parse --verify origin/main >/dev/null 2>&1; then
git --no-pager diff --color=never origin/main -- pkg/route/OWNERS || true
else
if git rev-parse HEAD^ >/dev/null 2>&1; then
git --no-pager diff --color=never HEAD^ -- pkg/route/OWNERS || true
else
echo "No origin/main or parent commit available to diff against."
fi
fiLength of output: 1861
Restrict approvers to a minimal, trusted set (pkg/route/OWNERS — approvers).
PR elevates 11 users to approvers though description only mentions adding Miciah; approvers gate merges — keep only knobunc and Miciah.
approvers:
- - knobunc
- - Miciah
- - alebedev87
- - rikatz
- - candita
- - rfredette
- - gcs278
- - davidesalerno
- - bentito
- - Thealisyed
- - grzpiotrowski
+ - knobunc
+ - Miciah📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - knobunc | |
| - Miciah | |
| - alebedev87 | |
| - rikatz | |
| - candita | |
| - rfredette | |
| - gcs278 | |
| - davidesalerno | |
| - bentito | |
| - Thealisyed | |
| - grzpiotrowski | |
| approvers: | |
| - knobunc | |
| - Miciah |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In pkg/route/OWNERS around lines 14 to 24, the approvers list incorrectly
includes 11 users though the PR described adding only Miciah; restrict the
approvers to the minimal trusted set by removing all additional usernames and
leaving only "knobunc" and "Miciah" in the approvers section so merges remain
gated to those two trusted approvers.
|
@alebedev87: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
1 participant
smarterclayton,pweil,rajatchopraandironcladloumoved to emeritus approvers.imcsk8,pravisankarandpecameronremoved from reviewers because they left Red Hat.jacobtanenbaumremoved from reviewers (not OpenShift Ingress&DNS team).