Pythonic types #284
Open
Pythonic types #284
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
WhyNotHugo
force-pushed
the
pythonic-types
branch
from
39ae293 to
b938679
Compare
WhyNotHugo
force-pushed
the
pythonic-types
branch
from
b938679 to
63317a8
Compare
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Now that 3.3 has been dropped, I've rebased this to the latest master. It's an attempt to use more pythonic types when passing values around (rather than dealing with so many
strandintdirectly).This is an initial effort to make APIs more obvious and clean.