-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
RDS/KJW/Rule 22-42 #1801
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feature/ashrae-9012022
Are you sure you want to change the base?
RDS/KJW/Rule 22-42 #1801
Conversation
- create a list of the expected entering condenser temperatures for the condenser water temperature for the validation calculations - expected_ecwt_temps - units are (F). The values are selected to capture the minimum, maximum, rating condition and some points in between: `expected_ecwt_temps = [60,104,85,72.5,97.5]` | ||
|
||
- get the coefficients for the EIR-f-T curve (IP units) using a table lookup for table J-6. This assumes that the lookup function will return a list with the coefficients in order (C1,C2,...): `eir_f_t_coefficients = table_J_6_lookup(curve_set,"EIR-f-T")` | ||
- get the coefficients for the CAP-f-T curve (IP units) using a table lookup for table J-6. This assumes that the lookup function will return a list with the coefficients in order (C1,C2,...): `cap_f_t_coefficients = table_J_6_lookup(curve_set,"Cap-f-T")` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JacksonJ-KC does this table_j_6 look up require a data set to be developed or does that dataset already exist?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JacksonJ-KC the RDS looks good but we should probably discuss precision out here. the coefficients in App J have 6 significant digits - from what I can tell, we're looking for an absolute match .. which might be unlikely at this level of precision.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It requires a new data table lookup that @yunjoonjung-PNNL has already taken care of
Agreed - let's discuss precision on the next call
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes Right! Thank you for pointing this out.
Previous conversation is at #1520