Skip to content

Conversation

@martinthomson
Copy link
Contributor

... with a name that can be changed, though I think we need to be clear about what distinguishes this from Storage Access proper.

Note that we are keeping this distinct from Storage Access as that is effectively graduated already, we're just holding on to it so that can complete the transition to WHATWG without falling through a process hole.

@mreichhoff, @johannhof, please review names.

... with a name that can be changed, though I think we need to be clear
about what distinguishes this from Storage Access proper.

Note that we are keeping this distinct from Storage Access as that is
effectively graduated already, we're just holding on to it so that can
complete the transition to WHATWG without falling through a process
hole.
Copy link
Member

@johannhof johannhof left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, Martin!

Copy link

@mreichhoff mreichhoff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants