test: single test error #936
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Meet-student, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a potential issue in the dayjs: getNow test within tests/generateWithTZ.spec.tsx. The change enhances the test's reliability by improving how time zone offsets are calculated and asserted. Instead of relying on a fixed offset value, the test now dynamically determines the expected offset and normalizes the actual offset, making it more robust against varying time zone configurations and edge cases related to hour differences.
Highlights
- Test Fix: Updated the
dayjs: getNowtest intests/generateWithTZ.spec.tsxto correctly calculate and assert time zone offsets. - Improved Offset Calculation: Replaced a hardcoded offset expectation with a dynamic calculation and normalization logic to ensure accurate testing across different time zones and edge cases.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
The pull request aims to fix a test by generalizing the timezone offset check. However, the current implementation for calculating the offset is overly complex and will fail for timezones with non-integer hour offsets (e.g., UTC+05:30). I've provided a suggestion that simplifies the code and makes it more robust by using the utcOffset() method, which is available in both dayjs and moment and correctly handles all timezone offsets.
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Walkthrough将 tests/generateWithTZ.spec.tsx 中对东京时区的固定 9 小时偏移断言替换为基于 dayjs 的 utcOffset() 动态对比：使用 M_now.utcOffset() 作为 expectedOffset，D_now.utcOffset() 作为 actualOffset，并断言两者相等。 Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #936 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.80% 98.80%
=======================================
Files 65 65
Lines 2669 2669
Branches 742 742
=======================================
Hits 2637 2637
Misses 29 29
Partials 3 3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Summary by CodeRabbit