Skip to content

Conversation

@ganchoradkov
Copy link
Member

Description

Type of change

  • Chore (non-breaking change that addresses non-functional tasks, maintenance, or code quality improvements)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Draft PR (breaking/non-breaking change which needs more work for having a proper functionality [Mark this PR as ready to review only when completely ready])
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

How has this been tested?

tests

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Additional Information (Optional)

Please include any additional information that may be useful for the reviewer.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 4, 2025 14:40
private setupEventHandlers = () => {
this.on("await_approval", async ({ approval, intentId }) => {
try {
console.log("await_approval", intentId);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Redundant Check and Debugging Logs

The awaitPaymentConfirmed method includes a redundant if (transactionResult) { break; } check within its while (!transactionResult) loop, as the while condition already ensures transactionResult is falsy on entry. Additionally, several console.log statements appear to be debugging code that was committed and could be removed or replaced with a proper logging solution.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

@ganchoradkov
Copy link
Member Author

closing in favour of WalletConnect/walletconnect-monorepo#6912

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants