-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Replace Vue Redux with Pinia #112
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
crookedneighbor
wants to merge
19
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
pinia-with-tests
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
scarletcs
reviewed
May 3, 2025
scarletcs
reviewed
May 3, 2025
crookedneighbor
commented
May 9, 2025
crookedneighbor
commented
May 9, 2025
Comment on lines
+110
to
+134
| it("manages card state for successful queries", async () => { | ||
| const game = useGameStore(); | ||
|
|
||
| vi.mocked(ScryfallApiInstance.getRandomArt).mockImplementation(() => { | ||
| return new Promise((resolve) => { | ||
| finishApiCall = resolve; | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| game.query = { search: "query" }; | ||
| game.card = CardBank.ArborElf; | ||
|
|
||
| const fetchPromise = game.fetchNextCard(); | ||
| await nextTick(); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(game.nextCardStatus).toEqual(LoadingStatus.Pending); | ||
| expect(game.previousCard).toEqual(CardBank.ArborElf); | ||
| expect(game.card).toEqual(CardBank.ArborElf); | ||
|
|
||
| finishApiCall(CardBank.Jolene); | ||
| await fetchPromise; | ||
|
|
||
| expect(game.nextCardStatus).toEqual(LoadingStatus.Success); | ||
| expect(game.previousCard).toEqual(CardBank.ArborElf); | ||
| expect(game.card).toEqual(CardBank.Jolene); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't love how this pattern of delaying the api response this way, but it was the best way I could figure out to assert on the state of the store before the api call finished. Open to suggestions though.
3b2098b to
914ba99
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a spike, so I only converted the config store, not the game store. If we like this approach, happy to convert over the game store as well. I've PR'd this into the add-testing-library branch so we can see more easily how much easier it is to work with this system as the store in the testing environment.
First time using pinia, overall, I like a ton better then the store we're currently using. I find it much easier to reason what's going on with it.
Functional changes:
"true"^ Users who are not messing with local storage should never see any difference