Adaptive Jitter Buffer with Burst-Aware Packet Discard #2018
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Implements adaptive jitter buffer sizing and burst-aware packet discard based on the research paper "Improved Jitter Buffer Management for WebRTC" (ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl., 2021).
Issue: #1906
Motivation
Current static jitter buffer configuration presents a dilemma:
Users must choose between latency and reliability, with no middle ground for variable network conditions.
Solution
This PR implements two complementary features:
1. Adaptive Buffer Sizing (Opt-in)
capacity = mean_jitter + 4σ(99.99% coverage)2. Burst-Aware Packet Discard (Always enabled)
n = (Δt/x) - BImplementation Details
New Configuration Options:
Two-Tier Overflow Handling:
Key Algorithms:
Backward Compatibility
Performance Impact
Expected Improvements
Based on the referenced paper and testing:
Files Changed
include/main.h: Added configuration flagsinclude/jitter_buffer.h: Added adaptive buffer fieldsdaemon/jitter_buffer.c: Core implementationdaemon/main.c: Command-line options and validationDocumentation
Detailed technical explanation available in GitHub Gist
Request for Review
Particularly interested in feedback on: