Skip to content

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mp911de mp911de linked an issue Sep 8, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@mp911de mp911de added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Sep 8, 2025
@mp911de mp911de marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 08:55
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Add missing commands.

Closes: #3191
Original pull request: #3193
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Use parametrized tests for Command enum verification.

See #3191
Original pull request: #3193
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Add missing commands.

Closes: #3191
Original pull request: #3193
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Use parametrized tests for Command enum verification.

See #3191
Original pull request: #3193
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Add missing commands.

Closes: #3191
Original pull request: #3193
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Wrapping is not required due to applying proper serializers. Also, the applied StringRedisConnection type cannot be easily consumed from StringRedisTemplate.

See: #3191
Original pull request: #3193
mp911de added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2025
Use parametrized tests for Command enum verification.

See #3191
Original pull request: #3193
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.4.10 (2024.1.10) milestone Sep 8, 2025
@mp911de mp911de closed this Sep 8, 2025
@mp911de mp911de deleted the issue/3191 branch September 8, 2025 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

SMISMEMBER is a unknown command for ConnectionSplittingInterceptor
2 participants