Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2023. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@Filmaluco
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@friedger friedger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please rebase the PR. This contains the changes from the last pr as well.

What about the DID method? Do you want to adapt the new specification?


if (didType == "btc-addr") {
return did.split(':')[2]
}else if (didType == "stx-addr") {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did a more generic version, and updated the validation since according to the documentation the following
did:stack:v0:15gxXgJyT5tM5A4Cbx99nwccynHYsBouzr-3, is correct and can existe a multiple of different transactions, names, and namespaces.

@Filmaluco Filmaluco requested a review from friedger September 9, 2021 10:40
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants