Skip to content

Conversation

Lennonka
Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka commented Sep 17, 2025

What changes are you introducing?

Converting xrefs to path based in Using Hammer guide

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

DITA compliance

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

  • Please, stick with the scope of the changes in this PR when reviewing.

Contributor checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.16/Katello 4.18 (Satellite 6.18)
  • Foreman 3.15/Katello 4.17
  • Foreman 3.14/Katello 4.16 (Satellite 6.17; orcharhino 7.4)
  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16; orcharhino 7.2 on EL9 only; orcharhino 7.3)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9; orcharhino 7.1 with Leapp)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.9.

@github-actions github-actions bot added Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Sep 17, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka changed the title Comply with DITA - xrefs Comply with DITA - xrefs in Using Hammer Sep 17, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka removed Needs tech review Requires a review from the technical perspective Needs testing Requires functional testing labels Sep 17, 2025
Copy link

The PR preview for 42d9cb7 is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-4274.surge.sh

No diff compared to the current base

show diff

@Lennonka Lennonka changed the title Comply with DITA - xrefs in Using Hammer Comply with DITA - Using Hammer - xrefs Sep 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

diff LGTM.

@maximiliankolb maximiliankolb added style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective and removed Needs style review Requires a review from docs style/grammar perspective labels Sep 18, 2025
@Lennonka Lennonka marked this pull request as draft September 25, 2025 01:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants