fix formatter for trace event fields

[d4mr]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Added support for paginated retrieval of pending transactions, enabling more flexible queue management.

• Refactor

  • Simplified job data structures by removing legacy fields and making certain fields mandatory for transaction execution and confirmation.
  • Improved transaction hash retrieval to provide clearer status feedback (pending or success).

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced nonce recycling logic to prevent unnecessary recycling of nonces that will be consumed.

• Style

  • Standardized and improved logging output throughout the system for better readability and debugging, including consistent formatting and structured logs.

• Chores

  • Updated internal logic to streamline address resolution and error handling, improving maintainability and future extensibility.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This set of changes standardizes logging across the codebase by removing or altering the use of explicit formatting specifiers (notably % for Display and ? for Debug) in tracing macros, switching to direct or debug formatting for variables. Several data structures are refactored for stricter typing, with optional fields removed and enums introduced for explicit state modeling. Methods related to transaction handling and job data are updated to match these new types, and new pagination functionality is added to pending transaction queries. No business logic or control flow is fundamentally altered except where type changes require more explicit handling of previously optional or ambiguous states.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Logging Format Standardization executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs, executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs, executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs, executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs, executors/src/eoa/worker/confirm.rs, executors/src/eoa/worker/error.rs, executors/src/eoa/worker/mod.rs, executors/src/eoa/worker/transaction.rs, executors/src/external_bundler/confirm.rs, executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs, executors/src/webhook/envelope.rs, executors/src/webhook/mod.rs, server/src/execution_router/mod.rs, server/src/http/routes/admin/queue.rs, server/src/http/routes/contract_write.rs, server/src/http/routes/transaction.rs, server/src/http/routes/transaction_write.rs, twmq/src/lib.rs, twmq/src/multilane.rs, core/src/rpc_clients/transport.rs	Logging macros updated to remove or switch % (Display) and ? (Debug) formatting specifiers, using direct or debug formatting for variables in all tracing statements. No logic or control flow changes.
EIP-7702 Data Structure Refactor executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs, executors/src/eip7702_executor/send.rs, server/src/execution_router/mod.rs	Removes deprecated/optional fields (eoa_address) and makes sender_details and execution_options required in job data structs. Refactors logic to use new required fields directly, removing legacy fallback logic.
Bundler Transaction Hash Response Refactor core/src/rpc_clients/bundler.rs, executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs	Replaces Option<String> transaction hash response with a tagged enum (Pending or Success), requiring explicit handling of pending/success states in transaction hash retrieval. Updates response handling logic accordingly.
EOA Store Pagination and Filtering executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs, executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs	Adds paginated transaction peeking (peek_pending_transactions_paginated) with offset/limit, updates existing peek method to use it, and filters recycled nonces above the highest submitted nonce.
EOA Worker Transaction Preparation Flow executors/src/eoa/worker/send.rs	Adds a should_break_on_failure parameter to result cleaning, allowing different error handling strategies for new vs. recycled transactions. Adjusts logic for batch size and nonce consumption.
Miscellaneous executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs	Adds Redis insertion of nonces to a "recycled nonces" set on transaction Nack/Fail outcomes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Bundler Transaction Hash Retrieval (Old vs. New)

Old Flow (Option)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Executor
    participant BundlerClient
    Executor->>BundlerClient: tw_get_transaction_hash()
    BundlerClient-->>Executor: Option<String> (Some(hash) or None)
    Executor->>Executor: If Some(hash): Success\nIf None: Error (not found)

Loading

New Flow (Tagged Enum)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Executor
    participant BundlerClient
    Executor->>BundlerClient: tw_get_transaction_hash()
    BundlerClient-->>Executor: TwGetTransactionHashResponse (Pending or Success{hash})
    Executor->>Executor: If Success: parse hash\nIf Pending: return "not yet confirmed" error

Loading

EOA Store: Paginated Pending Transaction Peek

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant EoaExecutorStore
    participant Redis
    Client->>EoaExecutorStore: peek_pending_transactions_paginated(offset, limit)
    EoaExecutorStore->>Redis: ZRANGE pending_tx (offset, offset+limit-1)
    Redis-->>EoaExecutorStore: [tx_id, timestamp]*
    EoaExecutorStore->>Redis: HGET user_request for each tx_id
    Redis-->>EoaExecutorStore: [user_request_json]*
    EoaExecutorStore-->>Client: [PendingTransaction]*

Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b28b15 and 7e26ede.

📒 Files selected for processing (24)

• core/src/rpc_clients/bundler.rs (2 hunks)
• core/src/rpc_clients/transport.rs (2 hunks)
• executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs (5 hunks)
• executors/src/eip7702_executor/send.rs (3 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs (3 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs (3 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs (2 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs (1 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/worker/confirm.rs (6 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/worker/error.rs (1 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/worker/mod.rs (11 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/worker/send.rs (5 hunks)
• executors/src/eoa/worker/transaction.rs (2 hunks)
• executors/src/external_bundler/confirm.rs (5 hunks)
• executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (3 hunks)
• executors/src/webhook/envelope.rs (1 hunks)
• executors/src/webhook/mod.rs (13 hunks)
• server/src/execution_router/mod.rs (4 hunks)
• server/src/http/routes/admin/queue.rs (3 hunks)
• server/src/http/routes/contract_write.rs (2 hunks)
• server/src/http/routes/transaction.rs (5 hunks)
• server/src/http/routes/transaction_write.rs (2 hunks)
• twmq/src/lib.rs (8 hunks)
• twmq/src/multilane.rs (8 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (2)

📚 Learning: the eoa executor store uses comprehensive watch-based coordination where every redis state mutation ...

Learnt from: d4mr
PR: thirdweb-dev/engine-core#5
File: executors/src/eoa/worker.rs:173-176
Timestamp: 2025-07-06T15:44:13.701Z
Learning: The EOA executor store uses comprehensive WATCH-based coordination where every Redis state mutation watches the lock key and validates ownership before proceeding. If the lock is lost during any operation, the transaction fails with LockLost error. This makes aggressive lock acquisition safe because only the actual lock holder can successfully perform state mutations, regardless of who claims the lock.

Applied to files:

• executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs
• server/src/execution_router/mod.rs
• executors/src/eoa/worker/mod.rs
• executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs

📚 Learning: in the eoa executor system, aggressive lock acquisition is safe because every redis state mutation u...

Learnt from: d4mr
PR: thirdweb-dev/engine-core#5
File: executors/src/eoa/worker.rs:173-176
Timestamp: 2025-07-06T15:44:13.701Z
Learning: In the EOA executor system, aggressive lock acquisition is safe because every Redis state mutation uses WATCH operations on the lock key. If the lock is lost during a transaction, the WATCH causes the transaction to fail and the worker exits gracefully. This provides coordination between workers even when using forceful lock takeover.

Applied to files:

• executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs
• server/src/execution_router/mod.rs
• executors/src/eoa/worker/mod.rs
• executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs

🧬 Code Graph Analysis (6)

server/src/http/routes/transaction_write.rs (7)

executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs (1)

• transaction_id (49-51)

executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs (1)

• transaction_id (32-34)

executors/src/eip7702_executor/send.rs (1)

• transaction_id (56-58)

executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs (1)

• transaction_id (73-78)

executors/src/webhook/envelope.rs (2)

• transaction_id (117-117)
• transaction_id (121-123)

core/src/execution_options/mod.rs (3)

• transaction_id (183-185)
• executor_type (170-177)
• chain_id (179-181)

executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs (1)

• chain_id (87-89)

executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs (2)

core/src/execution_options/mod.rs (1)

• chain_id (179-181)

eip7702-core/tests/integration_tests.rs (1)

• chain_id (118-120)

executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (7)

executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs (1)

• transaction_id (49-51)

executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs (1)

• transaction_id (32-34)

executors/src/eip7702_executor/send.rs (1)

• transaction_id (56-58)

executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs (1)

• transaction_id (73-78)

executors/src/webhook/envelope.rs (2)

• transaction_id (117-117)
• transaction_id (121-123)

core/src/execution_options/mod.rs (1)

• transaction_id (183-185)

twmq/src/job.rs (1)

• data (222-224)

executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs (2)

executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs (2)

• transaction_id (73-78)
• nonce (66-71)

executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs (2)

• nonce (368-373)
• pipeline (719-719)

server/src/http/routes/contract_write.rs (1)

core/src/execution_options/mod.rs (3)

• transaction_id (183-185)
• executor_type (170-177)
• chain_id (179-181)

executors/src/external_bundler/confirm.rs (6)

executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs (2)

• transaction_id (49-51)
• transaction_hash (200-200)

executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs (1)

• transaction_id (32-34)

executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs (1)

• transaction_id (73-78)

executors/src/webhook/envelope.rs (2)

• transaction_id (117-117)
• transaction_id (121-123)

executors/src/eoa/store/hydrate.rs (3)

• transaction_id (15-15)
• transaction_id (29-31)
• transaction_id (54-56)

twmq/src/job.rs (2)

• data (222-224)
• attempts (226-228)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)

• GitHub Check: coverage
• GitHub Check: test

🔇 Additional comments (74)

executors/src/eoa/worker/error.rs (1)

153-153: LGTM! Standardized debug formatting for error field.

The change from %error (Display) to ?error (Debug) formatting aligns with the PR objective and provides more detailed error information in traces. This is consistent with the context field which already uses Debug formatting.

core/src/rpc_clients/transport.rs (3)

67-67: LGTM! Improved debug formatting for HTTP status.

Using Debug formatting (?status) instead of Display formatting provides more structured logging output for the HTTP status code.

---

72-72: LGTM! Consistent debug formatting for response body.

The change to Debug formatting (?String::from_utf8_lossy(&body)) maintains consistency with other trace fields and provides better structured logging.

---

103-103: LGTM! Standardized URL formatting in debug span.

Using Debug formatting (?this.url) for the URL field is consistent with the overall formatting standardization effort.

server/src/http/routes/admin/queue.rs (1)

45-45: LGTM! Standardized logging field formatting.

The removal of % formatters for queue_name and the change from %e to ?e for error logging standardizes the trace event field formatting across the function. This provides cleaner output for string fields and more detailed Debug formatting for errors.

Also applies to: 103-103, 120-121

executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (1)

550-551: LGTM! Consistent logging format standardization.

The changes remove % formatters for transaction_id fields and switch error logging from Display (%e) to Debug (?e) formatting across all hook methods (on_success, on_nack, on_fail). This provides more detailed error information and maintains consistency with the codebase-wide logging standardization effort.

Also applies to: 558-559, 581-582, 608-609

server/src/http/routes/transaction.rs (1)

56-56: LGTM! Comprehensive logging format standardization.

All logging statements in the cancel_transaction function have been updated to remove % formatters for transaction_id and queue fields. This change provides cleaner, more consistent structured logging output while maintaining the same semantic information. The changes are applied uniformly across all log levels (info, warn) in the function.

Also applies to: 88-88, 96-96, 104-104, 114-114, 124-125, 135-135

server/src/http/routes/transaction_write.rs (2)

49-54: LGTM! Logging format standardization looks good.

The removal of explicit % display formatting for transaction_id and chain_id aligns with the PR objective to standardize tracing macros. Both fields (&str and u64) implement Display trait, so the output remains unchanged while being more concise.

---

62-66: LGTM! Consistent logging format update.

The logging format change for transaction_id is consistent with the earlier change in the function, maintaining the standardized approach across all tracing statements.

executors/src/eoa/store/atomic.rs (5)

107-112: LGTM! Proper logging format standardization.

The logging format changes are well-executed:

• eoa uses ? debug formatting (appropriate for Address type)
• chain_id and worker_id remove unnecessary % formatting
• Maintains same semantic information while improving consistency

---

117-123: LGTM! Consistent format updates.

The logging format changes are consistent with the previous debug statement, maintaining uniformity across the method.

---

127-133: LGTM! Error logging improvement.

The format changes are appropriate:

• Field formatting consistent with other statements
• error = ?e is better than error = %e for debug output of error types

---

197-203: LGTM! Consistent retry logging format.

The eoa = ?self.eoa() change maintains consistency with other logging statements in this file.

---

312-319: LGTM! Unified logging format across retry operations.

The eoa = ?self.eoa, change maintains consistency with the logging format established in other methods.

executors/src/eoa/store/submitted.rs (1)

478-483: LGTM! Smart nonce recycling optimization.

The filtering logic is well-implemented and makes business sense - recycled nonces that are higher than the highest submitted nonce don't need to be recycled since they'll be naturally consumed by incrementing the nonce counter. This prevents unnecessary overhead in the recycled nonces set.

The clear comment explains the reasoning well.

executors/src/eoa/worker/transaction.rs (2)

52-56: LGTM! Consistent debug logging format.

The change from % to ? for transaction_id maintains consistency with the logging format standardization across the codebase.

---

66-71: LGTM! Improved error logging format.

The format changes are appropriate:

• transaction_id = ? maintains consistency
• error = ?error is better than %error for debug output, providing more detailed error information

executors/src/eoa/store/borrowed.rs (3)

83-88: LGTM! Consistent logging format standardization.

The logging format changes align with the codebase-wide standardization:

• transaction_id = ? uses debug formatting
• nonce removes unnecessary % formatting for direct value logging

---

177-177: LGTM! Proper nonce recycling for nacked transactions.

Adding the nonce to the recycled nonces set when a transaction is nacked makes perfect sense - the nonce becomes available for reuse by other transactions. This coordinates well with the filtering logic in submitted.rs.

---

210-210: LGTM! Consistent nonce recycling for failed transactions.

Similar to the nack case, recycling the nonce when a transaction fails ensures the nonce can be reused, preventing nonce gaps and maintaining efficient nonce management.

server/src/http/routes/contract_write.rs (2)

115-120: Structured-log field specifiers removed – OK

Switching from transaction_id = %transaction_id / chain_id = %chain_id to the default formatter keeps the fields structured while avoiding the explicit Display flag. Behaviour and semantic meaning remain unchanged.
No issues spotted.

---

189-192: Consistent logging style maintained after queueing

Same observation as above – the log statement now mirrors the new project-wide convention. Looks good.

server/src/execution_router/mod.rs (4)

340-343: Updated log formatting is fine

transaction_id is now logged with the default formatter. No functional impact.

---

358-366: execution_options is now mandatory – verify other call sites

Eip7702SendJobData { execution_options: eip7702_execution_options.clone(), … } drops the former Some(...) wrapper.
Compilation will fail if any other instantiation still expects an Option. Please grep for Eip7702SendJobData constructors to ensure they are all updated.

Would you like an automated search script?

---

385-388: Logging tweak acknowledged

Consistent with the new style, no further comments.

---

506-509: EOA execution log updated – looks good

Nothing else changed in this block.

executors/src/webhook/envelope.rs (1)

273-278: Webhook queue log adopts new convention – OK

The field list stays intact; only the % specifiers were removed. Behaviour is unchanged.

twmq/src/lib.rs (1)

449-452: Logging specifier cleanup across queue internals

All touched statements now rely on Debug formatting rather than % Display. This keeps structured field output uniform everywhere. No functional impact.

Also applies to: 760-764, 845-847, 887-889, 895-897, 1193-1194, 1214-1220, 1293-1315

twmq/src/multilane.rs (6)

427-427: LGTM - Consistent logging format standardization

The removal of % format specifier for job_id aligns with the structured logging standardization effort across the codebase.

---

774-778: LGTM - Improved structured logging consistency

The changes standardize field formatting by removing % specifiers from job_id and lane_id fields while maintaining ? for error debugging. This improves logging consistency without affecting functionality.

---

781-785: LGTM - Consistent with logging standardization

The format changes align with the broader effort to standardize tracing field formatting across the codebase.

---

867-868: LGTM - Logging format consistency maintained

Removing the % format specifier for job_id is consistent with the standardization approach used throughout this file.

---

903-903: LGTM - Consistent formatting changes

The removal of % format specifiers for job_id fields maintains consistency with the logging standardization effort.

Also applies to: 911-911

---

1227-1230: LGTM - Comprehensive logging format standardization

All the changes consistently remove % format specifiers from string fields like job_id while preserving ? for error debugging. This standardization improves structured logging practices without affecting the underlying logic.

Also applies to: 1248-1252, 1256-1259, 1334-1337, 1350-1354, 1358-1361

executors/src/webhook/mod.rs (7)

9-9: LGTM - Import formatting

The reordering of the import statement has no functional impact.

---

240-244: LGTM - Structured logging improvement

The removal of % format specifiers for string fields (job_id, url, method) and numeric fields (attempt) improves structured logging consistency.

---

262-267: LGTM - Enhanced field-based logging

The change from format string with arguments to structured field logging improves log parsing and analysis capabilities.

---

273-273: LGTM - Appropriate debug formatting

Using ? for status formatting is appropriate for structured logging of status codes.

---

305-311: LGTM - Consistent logging standardization

All changes follow the same pattern: removing % specifiers for simple fields while using ? for debug formatting of complex types. This improves structured logging consistency throughout the webhook handler.

Also applies to: 319-323, 328-331, 350-350, 363-369, 378-382

---

397-401: LGTM - Hook logging improvements

The standardization of field formatting in the hook methods (on_success, on_nack, on_fail) maintains consistency with the process method changes.

Also applies to: 412-418, 429-433

---

450-455: LGTM - Webhook envelope logging standardization

The formatting changes in queue_webhook_envelopes function consistently apply the same structured logging improvements used throughout the file.

Also applies to: 503-509

executors/src/external_bundler/confirm.rs (4)

207-207: LGTM - Logging format standardization

The changes remove % format specifiers for transaction_id and switch to ? for boolean success field, which is appropriate for structured logging.

Also applies to: 210-210

---

243-243: LGTM - Consistent field formatting

Removing % from transaction_id and using ? for error formatting follows the established standardization pattern.

Also applies to: 252-252

---

269-270: LGTM - Hook method logging consistency

The formatting changes in on_nack method maintain consistency with the process method and other hook methods.

Also applies to: 276-277

---

308-310: LGTM - Comprehensive logging standardization

The on_fail method changes complete the consistent application of logging format standardization across all hook methods in this handler.

Also applies to: 318-319

executors/src/eoa/worker/confirm.rs (4)

83-83: LGTM - Error formatting improvement

Changing from %e to ?e provides better debug representation for errors in gas bump attempts.

---

125-127: LGTM - Receipt serialization logging improvements

The formatting changes improve structured logging for transaction confirmation details. Using ? for transaction_id and direct formatting for hash provides appropriate representation for each field type.

Also applies to: 135-137

---

265-265: LGTM - Gas bump logging standardization

The consistent use of ? formatting for transaction_id and error fields in gas bump operations improves debug visibility while maintaining structured logging practices.

Also applies to: 297-299, 313-315

---

340-340: LGTM - Transaction sending logging consistency

The formatting changes for transaction sending operations complete the standardization of logging throughout the gas bump flow.

Also applies to: 348-350

core/src/rpc_clients/bundler.rs (2)

74-86: LGTM - Improved API design with explicit state modeling

The refactoring from Option<String> to a tagged enum TwGetTransactionHashResponse significantly improves the API by:

1. Explicit state modeling: Pending vs Success { transaction_hash } is more self-documenting than None vs Some(hash)
2. Better type safety: Eliminates ambiguity about what None represents
3. Structured serialization: The tag = "status" approach provides clear JSON structure

This is a breaking change that will require updates to calling code, but it's a worthwhile improvement for API clarity.

---

162-168: LGTM - Method signature updated for new return type

The method signature and return statement correctly implement the new enum-based response type. Callers will need to pattern match on the enum variants instead of checking for None.

executors/src/eip7702_executor/send.rs (4)

41-41: LGTM: Improved type safety

Making execution_options mandatory eliminates potential runtime errors from accessing None values and makes the API more explicit.

---

199-209: LGTM: Cleaner address resolution logic

The direct pattern matching on execution_options variants is much cleaner than the previous fallback logic. The separation of owner address extraction and session key target determination is well-structured.

---

327-327: LGTM: Consistent with struct changes

Using sender_details from the success result maintains consistency with the removal of the optional eoa_address field and provides more structured sender information.

---

281-281: LGTM: Improved structured logging

The change from display (%) to debug (?) formatting standardizes the logging format and improves compatibility with structured logging systems.

executors/src/eip7702_executor/confirm.rs (4)

5-5: LGTM: Better type safety with explicit enum

Using TwGetTransactionHashResponse enum instead of Option<String> provides better type safety and makes the transaction status more explicit.

---

35-35: LGTM: Consistent type safety improvement

Making sender_details mandatory aligns with the broader pattern of removing optional fields and improves type safety.

---

189-214: LGTM: Enhanced transaction hash handling

The explicit enum handling improves error clarity and provides better retry logic. The pattern matching correctly handles both Success and Pending states with appropriate error messages and requeue behavior.

---

269-269: LGTM: Clean data flow

Direct use of the mandatory sender_details field maintains clean data flow without optional wrapping complexity.

executors/src/eoa/worker/mod.rs (6)

130-130: LGTM: Enhanced tracing instrumentation

Adding explicit name parameter and using debug formatting (?) for the EOA address improves trace identification and structured logging consistency.

---

173-173: LGTM: Improved error logging structure

The change to structured logging with named error field and debug formatting improves log searchability and integration with logging systems.

---

235-240: LGTM: Comprehensive structured logging

The consistent use of structured logging with debug formatting for EOA, chain_id, and error fields provides better context preservation and log analysis capabilities.

---

279-336: LGTM: Consistent structured logging pattern

The systematic application of structured logging with debug formatting across all error scenarios provides consistent log format and better monitoring capabilities.

---

379-379: LGTM: Transaction logging consistency

Using debug formatting for transaction_id maintains consistency with the structured logging improvements and aids in transaction flow debugging.

---

478-478: LGTM: Enhanced method tracing

Adding structured fields with debug formatting to the tracing instrument improves trace context and distributed tracing capabilities.

executors/src/eoa/store/mod.rs (3)

407-410: LGTM: Consistent logging format improvements

The change to debug formatting for EOA and chain_id fields aligns with the broader logging standardization and improves structured output quality.

---

507-508: LGTM: Clean API preservation

Refactoring the existing method to delegate to the paginated version with offset 0 maintains backward compatibility while avoiding code duplication.

---

510-561: LGTM: Well-implemented pagination support

The paginated method implementation is solid with proper:

• Early return optimization for zero limit
• Correct Redis ZRANGE index calculation
• Appropriate error handling and empty result checks
• Efficient pipeline usage for bulk data retrieval

executors/src/eoa/worker/send.rs (6)

121-121: LGTM: Defensive iterator handling

Adding .take(prepared_results.len()) prevents iterator length mismatches and ensures proper pairing of results with pending transactions. Good defensive programming practice.

---

126-126: LGTM: Appropriate parameter for recycled nonces

Using false for should_break_on_failure when processing recycled nonces is correct, as order is less critical and we want to process all available recycled nonces.

---

221-237: LGTM: Well-documented API enhancement

The addition of should_break_on_failure parameter with comprehensive documentation provides clear control over failure handling. The distinction between recycled nonce processing (continue on failure) and incremented nonce processing (break on failure) is well-explained and architecturally sound.

---

242-281: LGTM: Enhanced failure handling logic

The failure tracking mechanism is well-implemented:

• Proper state management with failure_occurred flag
• Clear match patterns for different scenarios
• Preserved balance threshold tracking functionality
• Improved structured error logging
• Appropriate handling of success cases after failure occurs

---

349-349: LGTM: Correct parameter for incremented nonces

Using true for should_break_on_failure when processing new transactions with incremented nonces is correct, as it maintains nonce continuity by breaking on the first failure.

---

420-422: LGTM: More accurate budget tracking

Subtracting moved_to_submitted count instead of total moved_count provides more accurate budget tracking by only accounting for transactions that actually consumed nonces. This prevents budget over-consumption due to failed transactions.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch pb/fix-tracing-event-field-formatting

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.